|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
FreeState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:23 PM Original message |
Federal lawsuit over Prop 8 filed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's only fair if everybody gets an injunction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. TED OLSON?????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
konnichi wa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. This must be a different Ted Olson. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. no, it's the same one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. Now that's an interesting tack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. Excellent! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
7. Holy fucking shit.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
8. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
9. Holy Crap... Two Repugs... Who would have thought it? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. they're both repugs? I don't like hearing that, it makes me think they took up the fight only to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Boies is a repug? That explains his performance in Bush v. Gore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. This is my suspicion as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
11. I like the prelim injunction: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
armyowalgreens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
12. This is not the right time to bring gay rights to the USSC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:02 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Do a head count. It is my belief that we have five votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. Won't it have to go through the appellate court first? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
armyowalgreens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:41 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. They filed directly with the USSC right? It will be reviewed by the USSC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:38 PM Response to Reply #26 |
33. The OP says it was filed in Federal District Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
armyowalgreens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:50 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. oh okay I misread I thought it went to the USSC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
13. Excellent news. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
14. Holy shit. TED FUCKING OLSEN is now better on marriage equality than our Democratic President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Exactly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:51 PM Response to Reply #14 |
43. Pathetic and embarrassing: yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
17. That's great...unless they're taking a dive on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
19. Now, THAT'S what I'm talkin' about! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Massacure (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
21. I think Equal Protections is the wrong avenue to take. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:33 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. The Supremes can decide it any way they wish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
22. I smell a rat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:52 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Me. too. I'd rather see the ACLU take this on. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
24. OMG - Ted Olson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Towlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
28. How could a federal court legalize gay marriage in California without including the entire country? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:12 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. they couldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
t0dd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
30. If a gay marriage case reached the SCOTUS right now, would we absolutely lose? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:36 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. read what I wrote upthread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
t0dd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:40 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Yeah.. nice observation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:44 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. I also think he would author the decision in the marriage case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
t0dd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:54 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. How long would this take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:16 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Dunno |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:58 PM Response to Reply #34 |
44. which may well be why Olson et al have no problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
31. Ted Olson and David Boies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:08 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Barbara Olson was very nasty to Hillary as I remember. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
39. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadowLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
41. Bad idea with this court, it might just tempt the neocons on it to overturn all gay marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
t0dd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:29 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. We already have five. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC