Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The reasons we the people of the party are frustrated, feeling left out....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 11:35 PM
Original message
The reasons we the people of the party are frustrated, feeling left out....
It's been a deliberate planned move to make the progressives of the party inconsequential. It has gone on for years. The people who pulled it off are the ones you see on TV who are careful and cautious in their speech and don't have a clue how to debate the "party of no" Republicans.

The GOP has had a plan for years. Talk louder, be fearless, be on the attack...and don't worry about how what they say sounds. Say it loud enough, be positive enough...and people will believe it.

Democratic leaders have had a plan as well. Be cautious, don't make waves, don't be too offensive to the other party or they might stop our agenda.
Hey, that worked until we got such a control of congress and the White House. Now it is just a big joke.

From an article by John Nichols in 2000.

Behind the takeover

We have heard the story before, but we should be taking it more seriously now. We see the ones who are inner circle folks, the ones who are out of the circle...way out. We need to remember.

At the national convention of a major political party, an ideologically rigid sectarian clique secures the ultimate triumph. It inserts two of its own as nominees for the Presidency and the Vice Presidency. Heavily financed by the most powerful corporations in the world, the group's leaders gather in a private club fifty-four floors above the convention hall, apart from the delegates of the party they had infiltrated. There, they carefully monitor the convention's acceptance of a platform the organization had drafted almost in its entirety. Then, with the ticket secured and with the policy course of the party set, they introduce a team of 100 shock troops to deploy across the country to lock up the party's grassroots.

This is not some fantastic political thriller starring Harrison Ford or Sharon Stone. This is the real-life version of Invasion of the Party Snatchers--with the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) burrowing into the pod that is the Democratic Party.


Jesse Jackson said ""We have all these progressive Democrats here ready to fight on issues of economic and social justice, Democrats who know these are the winning issues and who know that when we fail to run on them we lose," said Representative Jesse Jackson Jr., Democrat of Illinois. "But, in the leadership positions of the party, we have the DLC trying to pull us in an entirely different direction."

He was right. The little people had no chance against the corporations. Their goal was to end dependency on unions and minorities. They did it well.


The triumphalist talk was backed up by the reality of the convention. Vice President Al Gore, a man present at the founding of the DLC and loyal to the organization ever since, was nominated for the Presidency. Connecticut Senator Joseph Lieberman, the current president of the DLC and very possibly the truest of its true believers, was nominated for the Vice Presidency.

And, with virtually no debate, the convention endorsed a platform that, on the vast majority of issues, deviated radically from the views of most party members. According to a New York Times survey of convention delegates, Traditional liberalism remained the most popular ideological stance. Trade union members made up a quarter of the delegates, and people of color were better represented than at any major party gathering in the nation's history.


They are doing the same thing now on the health care plans. They will probably do it on charter schools, massive changes to Social Security and Medicare, and policies that benefit not the people but the big guys with the money.

In 2004 Jamal Simmons, who is becoming a centrist spokesperson on TV more often now....announced the coming changes.

It's time to pass torch, younger Dems say

A wave of young Democrats is demanding not just to be heard but to take charge.

"This generation is looking for ways to participate because we're tired of losing," says Jamal Simmons, 33, a consultant who has worked for presidential hopeful Wesley Clark and several other Southern candidates.

Simmons and his fellow "Young Turks" worry about the Democratic Party's dependence on interest groups, their relations with minority groups, the stereotypes that they are weak on defense and values, the Republican appropriation of the "reformer" label and the swaths of America that Democrats seem to have written off.

Young Democrats believe that the party is dominated by people who came of age politically in the 1960s, and it's time for them to make room for new ideas and new voices. Theirs.

"We respect the struggles of the feminist movement, the civil rights movement and Vietnam, but (we) are not defined by those struggles," says Kirsten Powers, 37, a New York-based strategist and commentator for Fox News. "We want to take what is good in liberalism and make it better, and get rid of what is not working."


They were worried about what the GOP might think of their agenda. Even then we were allowing the right wing of both parties to set the agenda. Anyone who pointed it out was soon on the way out of party leadership.

Actually things got so bad with all the pushy progressives being so loud that the NY SUN had an article called Centrist Democrats Ponder How To Counter Netroots

They were/are so afraid of the netroots/grassroots that they had to "ponder" how to get us out of the picture. Interesting phrasing. From 2006

At a time when centrism has become a dirty word in some Democratic Party circles, hundreds of the party's avowed moderates are convening in Denver this weekend to discuss their agenda for this fall's election and the presidential contest in 2008. The annual meeting of the Democratic Leadership Council, a group that came to prominence in connection with President Clinton's electoral victory in 1992, takes place as the organization has become a lightning rod for criticism from liberal Web-based activists known as the netroots.

The Denver gathering is scheduled to hear from the putative Democratic frontrunner for 2008, Senator Clinton, as well as other possible contenders such as Senator Bayh of Indiana, Governor Vilsack of Iowa, and Governor Richardson of New Mexico.

..."The tension dates back to the last presidential race when council officials threw cold water on the populist, Webdriven campaign of Howard Dean. Dr. Dean, who is now chairman of the Democratic National Committee, derided the council as the "Republican wing of the Democratic Party." A sharp-tongued aide for a Dean rival told the New Republic that the Vermont governor's Internet-savvy backers resembled the grotesque denizens of the "bar scene from ‘Star Wars.'"


Now wasn't that nice? To call us grotesque denizens of the bar scene from Star Wars.

Seriously, we should not be surprised that we who are against the wars continuing, who are pro public health care plans, who are adamant that Social Security will be fine, that people who plan torture should be investigated, that gays don't deserve the DADT policy, that women should have the right to control every aspect of their health decisions......we are the ones who are being ignored.

The agenda was set long ago.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Barack Obama on community organizing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am speaking not of Obama, but of the ones around him who grab power.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. There was a good thread about that
A thread about Rahm. It got misplaced. I could send you a copy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. PM me the link.
I have written much about him, and when he and the other Chicago folks were picked for the inner circle....I felt like I was not a part of the party. Still trying, though. Maybe someday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I posted the Obama video, not to call attention to Obama, but to call attention to what he said
The point is that "power" can arise in various ways: it can be created by organization, whether bought by corporate dollars or constructed by voluntary grassroots organizations

It is a mistake to expect real reforms to flow from the top down -- because a thousand filters constantly determine who actually fills slots at the top and what views are held by those who ascend to those levels. The hard work of demanding reforms, and of indicating the nature of those reforms, must be worked out from below

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Agreed.
I am still seething though at how the man who did so much for the grassroots organizing, going to all 50 states....was summarily dismissed from national party leadership.

I agree that real reform must come from the bottom up. That is what many Conservadems don't want....and it is what Obama needs us to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonfli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. If I Could Kick This Any Harder I would Break A Virtual Foot
Edited on Wed May-27-09 12:34 AM by Dragonfli
If I could recommend this more emphatically I would have the writing prowess to begin a novel.

The usual will have to suffice.

If those same centrists continue the same shenanigans here they have been of late, no "classic" Dems will be able to stand it.

One by one I read as progressive heros are first denigrated, then laughed at, then vilified by Centrists (DLC, NEW WAY, Blue Dog, Cult of personality worshipers it makes no difference which brand) in an attempt to purify the party of any dissent - no matter how corporate or against the law the centrist care to take policy. (the irony is that they claim the classic Dems are the ones attempting purification.)

It is happening Here, Now. The newest Villain of the day is Rachel Maddow who I have been told "lies about Obama Because she dislikes him." A point clarified by another in the same thread as "holding a gay grudge" Lots Of AGREEMENT AS WELL!!:puke: Turley has been completely derided for his views and I believe will no longer ever be mentioned again except to call him a hack. Feingold will last maybe one more week and DK well, he dies hard around here but not through lack of attempts to marginalize him.

I believe that soon, the centrist goals will be beyond the core parties abilities to reign them in no matter how little they represent most democrats.

I for one really don't like this huge forced shift of a party I was a member of for twenty five years so far to the right that Nixon would appear leftist in comparrison. Unfortunately the cash wins, and labor, working poor, minorities, civil libertarians and gay people (that have their hands full already with a fight against well funded religious bigots) can never compete with the corporate buy out of my once proud party.

As far as truth goes, we can speak it for now, but I guarantee that paid operatives will pounce until all truth is marginalized. Even when we speak for 2 thirds of the population like with health care. They will appear as if by magick to defend against "unfair attacks on Obama."
What is happening with Rachel should tell you what happens if truth is spoken regarding equality.

I couldn't even believe the shit I read today about her.

Er, ah, sorry about the rant. been a tough day for me. How you been doing?

(spelling edit - prolly missed more but I'm tired)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Doing fine after reading your righteous rant.
You said a lot of good things and worded it well. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Thank you for your very honest and wonderful words.
Edited on Wed May-27-09 02:10 AM by truedelphi
I'm such a Maddow fan I didn';t even realize that lately, she has been a target here on DU.

Well, is her putting her head in the saned and pretending that Obama is doing the right thing going to save us?

I got derided two days ago from someone on DU who said my statements that our nation has spent 9 trillion bucks (For the Bailouts) are incorrect. Then I did some research on my hard drive, and found that this statement came from "CNN Money" in December. And today, Naomi Klein puts the figure at a whopping 11.5 trillion dollars (The video was posted in Political videos today.)

Having President Obama go ahead and allow the Wall Street crowd to become a privileged fiefdom on the backs and through the meagre resources of the working class is nothing less than a sham. (And it is something that Richard Nixon would not have done.) But the RW had been so Nazi like that Obama's personality mesmerizes, as he seems like such a softie. Yet when you analyze what is going on, the Nazis are gone, so the Hard Right Centrists owned by the Corproations are now Worshipped by so many Democrats. Worshipped.

Nonetheless Obama's economic policies (Spun by his economic appointees) are going to prove very hard on the middle incomed, and hardest of all on the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Break one of mine too.
As far as I can tell, the values of the Serious Moderates amount to perpetual electioneering and perpetual surrender, which has now resulted in perpetual war and perpetual war criminality.

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. I looked around DU at those threads
and wondered where the hell I was.. Rachel, Keith, Jon & Stephen are STILL the only regular representatives we have on the air.. They get an occasional boost from Schuster and (from CNN) Rick Sanchez.. but it's still pretty damn lonely out there.. and the network frames remain relentlessly right wing. The animus against Turly really surprised me. None of the clips I've seen, nothing I've heard him say on the air rises to NEARLY the trangressions implied by the florid rhetoric I've seen here.

We are under attack in a way we never were before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. yep
We are for sure. Under attack that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
74. "We are under attack in a way we never were before the election."
Aint that the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unapatriciated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
39. Your rant is great, been feeling the same for awhile.
I have been a D since the late 60's and can not understand my fellow D's attacking liberals or progressives in the same way as the right does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
57. I stumbled into a thread
a few days ago ridiculing Gandhi. And it wasn't the first I've seen.

It IS happening here, NOW, and no one who can even see the left side of center is exempt.

I'll second your rant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
78. I checked in briefly yesterday and actually read Thom Hartmann
being compared to Pigboy Rush. Two sides of the same rusty coin was one comment. I couldn't believe it and went back outside to work some more. Rachel gets trashed here and I can't believe some of the nastiness that is posted here.

Rant away! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. I love your stuff. TRULY. K&R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Outstanding!
Nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. THEY LIE!
"The GOP has had a plan for years. Talk louder, be fearless, be on the attack...and don't worry about how what they say sounds. Say it loud enough, be positive enough...and people will believe it."


THEY LIE!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yes, they do, and we don't call them on it.
And we need to do it every time they spin or lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
17. Divide and rule. All by design
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. And they do rule.
They have set the agenda, our leaders follow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. Too many Hufflepuffs, not enough Gryffindors on the Dem side of Congress. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. And a few too many Slieberins! (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
19. K&R with thanks...
....from one who came of age politically in the 1960s.

This is a terrific thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. And it was going on back in 1995 when Al From dissed unions and Jesse Jackson.
1995 quote from Al From....about unions and Jesse Jackson.

Al From himself embodies John Maynard Keynes' warning that the real difficulty in changing any enterprise lies not in developing new ideas but in escaping from old ones. "The problem for us and him," says From, "is that Clinton promised to be different. He's been that a bit, but the whole is less than the sum of the parts. The fundamental change he pledged hasn't come. We've been consistent in articulating the ideas he won on, but he hasn't been consistent in advancing them. We were at this before Clinton, and we'll be at it after he's gone, because a long-term majority will never be created around the interests represented by Jesse and the labor unions. Most people are politically homeless now. They're our target. We'll work to get Clinton to pursue us, but we're damn sure going to make it hard for him to catch us."

Which means what? "Al feels a loyalty to Clinton because he feels responsible for electing him," says Steinhardt. "But what we're planning is bigger than some psychological thing. We'll just have to see if Clinton buys our new stuff. If not, and someone else takes it on, then we'll probably fracture." Then Clinton will have even more trouble than he has already.


This should let us know that their group was never about party, but about corporate ideology.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. K&R from another fan. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. If only I could recommend this 100 times
DLC = pod people from Invasion of the Body Snatchers - perfect analogy. And sadly, President Obama is acting a lot like he's a pod person who replaced Candidate Obama. And most definitely Community Organizer Obama and State Senator Obama.

The Democratic Party would have died, and deservedly so, after the DLC lead the gung ho cheerleading on the "Patriot" Act and the Iraq war vote. Howard Dean saved this fucking party, and now those pieces of shit are trying to undo everything he did. And if they get away with it, there won't be another revival this time. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Obama Caves
the title of many threads on DU - about almost every subject
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Yeah, the truth hurts. We have "the foxes in charge of the hen houses" in regard
to BOTH Finance and Defense.

He has caved. Otherwise he'd replace all those warmongering generals who Dubya loved so much. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Yes He Does!
But he never caves to Democrats. Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #35
54. Pragmatism....Dems can't get elected unless they make sure they bow down to those
who control the voting machines...plus the Lobbyists and Financiers and the Vast Military/Media/Industrial Complex who control all of it...

No "Tinfoil" needed these days to say this...because so many of have lived through "life experience of this that we could write our own history books and have enough "footnotes" to make folks sweat in awe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
29. KickAnd Rec.
Comment later.

Great as usual MF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
31. MadFloridian, I ALWAYS agree with your posts on this topic.
Edited on Wed May-27-09 06:48 PM by Blue_In_AK
And for what it's worth, I still like Rachel and Professor Turley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
32. kick (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJessamine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
33. K&R!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Colors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
34. K&R (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
36. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. The Democratic party is disappearing
Just like the republican party disappeared. Reactionary radicals took control of the republican party pulling it into positions and behavior that stalwarts of the gop thirty years ago wouldn't recognize.

Meanwhile, the moderate and conservative members of the Democratic party have commandeered the train and pulled it even to the right of the center track.

Corporations have won. In the days of the old monopolies, we had company towns. America has become a company country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
38. "Change" is more than tinkering with a corrupt system by members of the sytem.
Which has given rise to the "not as bad", "bi-partisan", "practical politics", "patience", "chess-game", apologists for the status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. kick and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. ....
:pals: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
40. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
43. You lost me when the post demeaned the selection of Al Gore. Whether
Gore was DLC or not is irrelevant. HE IS A MODEL CITIZEN OF THE WORLD AND A PATRICIAN WHO CARES ABOUT OUR COUNTRY AND THE PLANET EARTH. What other choice would have been more likely for dems in 2000 than the sitting Vice President? This alone depletes the value of the argument. No one had to go to a dark room to select Al Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. The DLC turned on Gore when he ran more populist in 2000. I quoted the article.
Edited on Wed May-27-09 08:29 PM by madfloridian
Remember Mark Penn said that is why he lost.. Some think that is why he was sort of left hanging without much party support in the recount.

I did not demean Al Gore. You need to read more carefully. The DLC has demeaned Gore and Dean and many other of our good party folks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. And probably a good reason
that he decided not to run this time. He knew the party central wouldn't support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. He became populist, they left him hanging.
Dean called them the Republican wing of the party, he was pushed along out of the door.

They do not tolerate criticism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Lord, don't we see that here on DU. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #49
73. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #73
77. ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mermaid7 Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
44. This Looks Too Much Like Kent State
What's happening w this country, with the police against the people?

Who's business is it, (certainly not our government) to ordain marriage???


I need not say this, but I am straight, just so everyone who is staight or gay knows, how everyone else is feeling about this.

It's not our government's place to legislate love, or religious ceremonies.

They need to get the fuck out of our personal business and religious beliefs.

Separation of Church and State, remember that one?????????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mermaid7 Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Sorry, clicked on the wrong part 2 thread. NM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
47. I did not demean Gore. The article was 2000, and at that time Gore was part of it.
I admire Gore, and the party let him down.

The article was written in the year 2000, and I wish people would read first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. I think the centrists in the early stages
thought they could do the right thing with that strategy. Gore may have been one of those. But shortly after the Clinton election, the neocon movement just used their good intentions to roll over them. The roll over continued until the ones who started out caring just stared caving. Then the corporate opportunists in the party started taking over when they saw the money to be made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #52
64. Good points.
Trouble it that it was mostly white Southern men who founded this to appeal to the Southern frame of mind.

I often wondered how Lieberman got to be VP...it made sense after learning all this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
48. Why can't we be progressive, intelligent and make money, and live a good life?
this woman wants to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #48
67. Because some people are greedy and want all the resources.
It's a dysfunctional distribution problem inherent to unregulated capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
51. "Agenda set long ago"....story of our lives..isn't it.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solstice Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
55. Great post. It doesn't feel like Democrats are in power. Feels more like BushCo still is./nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
56. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
58. S.W.T.F.P.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurgedVoter Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
59. K&R !!!!!!
Total agreement here.

I think we can win however. If we form our own DLC equivalent. We don't get to elect the DLC or set it's agenda.

The money interests should not get to elect or set our groups agendas either. Start the board with Dean, Dodd, Kucinich, Gore and a few others who have what it really takes to lead. Lets grab Turley, Maddow, Micheal Moore and Krugman. Add in H2OMan, Mad Floridian and a few big bloggers. Then lets see what that think tank can make. Let's see who would donate their time and money to invest in filling in the ranks and replacing the Off the Table, Dry Powder politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
60. I take offense that as a Baby
Boomer, I am one of the status quo. I have been Left of Left for years. Just because someone is a certain age doesn't make one a Centrist.

As for the younger generation, it's about time you start to fight. Young women have had to fight for nothing...it was given to you.

You'll run into the same frustrations that I have with the Dems. As far as I am concerned, we are targeting the wrong group. We need to go after the CEOs of the Corporations who are funding the Dems. THEY ARE THE PROBLEM. After all the Dems are just doing what they've been told to do by those giving them MONEY. Remember, follow the money.

Pick a bank....boycott it. Go viral on what it has done. I'd pick Chase....just because it's David Rockefeller's baby.

Pick an Insurance Company....AIG (of course).

Pick Monsanto....they're killing us and the environment.

These are the Targets...our representatives and elections are simply DISTRACTIONS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born_A_Truman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirrera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
61. KICK and REC!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
62. Thank you, Madflo!! This needed saying and you laid it out for all to see.
Now the question is: how do we get the bastards out of power? We can't buy them off or co-opt them. I was hoping that groups like ActBlue might be able to help us get some new Progressive candidates on the slate. Is that a good route to take? Through ActBlue or some other groups?

I feel like I've been yelling til I'm blue in the face, but my Senator and my Representative, both Democrats, are not listening. Their ears are tuned to the vocal frequencies only of those who control the dollars electronically flowing into their coffers. In many cases they've had the Divine Right of Re-election conferred upon them by the party leadership. Being in "safe" seats, they're in until they choose to retire, or scandal turns them out.

The response to this thread has been encouraging. It is inspiring to hear the words of so many who support what you are saying in the OP. We must continue to expose the flaws in the centrist arguments. Every time we get the chance we must be as eloquent as we can in defending our positions. There are still many, many DU'ers who will listen to a well-presented argument. Keep up the good work.

Recommended.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
65. Be patient.
:hi:

There's a secret master plan that is yet to unfold that we are waiting for.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. Does it require powder that is not dry?
}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmboxer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
66. I am so disappointed
America, a plutocracy, will never have universal healthcare like the rest of the would. Insurance Co., drug co. CEO's need their huge bonuses for their expensive call girls, planes, cars, mansions, etc., while the poor/middle class get nothing. Most will have to die a terrible death while the rich die an easy death. Something has to be done. I am so tired of the damned lies. I am beginning to think that Nader was right after all. Sometimes I wish I should never have bothered to have voted. Never let anyone tell you America is a democracy, it is a plutocracy, only for the damned extremely rich, to Hell with the poor/middleclass. They will throw us a few crumbs while laughing. They "all" have healthcare, fantastic retirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
69. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results . . .
We're not active enough --

We're not raising enough hell--

And they're quite confident that we aren't going to, either!!!

If we want change we need to fight for it -- !!!

We need to end campaign fund BRIBERY -- get IRV voting --

Create Plan B --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
70. Magnificent post, mf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livefreest Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
71. i just found this article by John Nichols, titled How to Push Obama in the January 2009 issue of
The Progressive. I find it extremely insightful, and Nichols, it seems he had some foresight of the problems progressives would run into as they try to get their voices heard. very interesting articles.
How to Push Obama by John Nichols read it! read it! read it!

here's just a small excerpt:

What Internet activists such as OpenLeft.com's Matt Stoller and Firedoglake.com's Jane Hamsher did during the FISA fight was roughly equivalent to what Obama told Dr. Young to do back in 2005: "Pick up the phone and call me." They were undermined by a rally-round-the-candidate mentality that protected Obama during the campaign season.(we've been seeing this behavior right here on DU) Yet netroots activists made themselves heard and earned a response from candidate Obama. And they can do much more with respect to President Obama. As Hamsher notes, "We can get the public engaged."

And so they must, especially with that portion of the public that took seriously the candidate's promise of "change we can believe in." But to do this effectively, activists cannot wait for Obama to define the playing field. They must assume that he knows what they know. And this requires a radically different approach than the left took to Southern centrist Democratic Presidents such as Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter.

The way to influence Obama and his Administration is to speak not so much to him as to America. Get out ahead of the new President, and of his spin-drive communications team. Highlight the right appointees and the right responses to deal with the challenges that matter most. Don't just critique, but rather propose. Advance big ideas and organize on their behalf; identify allies in federal agencies, especially in Congress, and work with them to dial up the pressure for progress. Don't expect Obama or his aides to do the left thing. Indeed, take a lesson from rightwing pressure groups in their dealings with Republican administrations and recognize that it is always better to build the bandwagon than to jump on board one that is crafted with the tools of compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tan guera Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #71
72. Great, madfloridian, just great!
Since both *parties* are imploding, why not do what everyone says can't be done...and do it? Start a third party with the progressives already in power. We could form a huge grass roots movement, choose a candidate to challenge Obama (if he doesn't shape up, which doesn't look promising) refuse to take part in the IA primary..refuse to get behind any of the ÇM schtick - stop funding Obama. The Naderites, Indies and Greens would have to unite behind on person along with the dems and repugs who are sick of this s*** and tired of war.

I kept saying before the IA primary that people should stand in the corner for Kucinich, not for Obama. If people stand in a progressive corner, the CM will have to cover it and a true progressive peace candidate could win the IA primary.

The time for a peace candidate is upon us. And it's not Obama or a repug.

We can do this. We have to do this. Rachel and Keith can lead the way and I'm saddened to think that dems are marginalizing them. But I know dems who are so blinded by Obama-Light that they can't see; and god forbid they admit they made a mistake.

Let's all write Rachel and Keith and give them lots of kudos.

That's MY rant for the night! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
75. This analysis should inform analysis and evaluation of the Obama presidency
All the truths of party carefully laid out here have been clearly shown to be fully applicable to this presidential administration as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
76. Error: you can only recommend threads which were started in the past 24 hours
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
79. Thanks again madfloridian.
Too late to K&R, but I've bookmarked this for later reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
80. This is a great OP
And wholly truthful, unfortunately.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC