Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney Prepares the Twinkie Defense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:03 AM
Original message
Cheney Prepares the Twinkie Defense
Cheney Prepares the Twinkie Defense
Scott Horton - May 26, 2009 - http://harpers.org/archive/2009/05/hbc-90005038


Why, after spending eight years as both the most powerful and most reclusive vice president in White House history, has Dick Cheney suddenly fallen in love with the media? There are two plausible answers. First, the innocent one. As the New York Times reports, Cheney is having a hard time finding a publishing house willing to offer the advance he wants for his book. He’s never going to match Bill Clinton’s $15 million, but Cheney is doing just what he needs to do to put his $2 million plus advance target in view.

But his primary motive may be a bit darker. Liz Cheney spilled the beans in her own inimitable way in a couple of cable news appearances last week. Her father is out giving speeches because he’s afraid that the growing pressure for an inquiry over torture will ultimately lead to the appointment of a special prosecutor. Here’s how Liz Cheney worded it in an appearance on CNN:

I don’t think he planned to be doing this, you know, when they left office in January. But I think, as it became clear that President Obama was not only going to be stopping some of these policies… that he was suggesting that perhaps we would even be prosecuting former members of the Bush Administration.


Only Dick Cheney knows how prominent his role was in the conspiracy that resulted in the introduction of torture as a matter of routine practice, but his conduct so far suggests that his role was defining. His recent speeches suggest that he is preparing a variation on the famous “Twinkie defense” used by Dan White to evade punishment for the murders of George Moscone and Harvey Milk in his trial back in 1979. White argued that eating junk food caused violent mood swings, diminishing his capacity for rational thought. And a wacky liberal San Francisco jury fell for it.

..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'll take Door #2 Monty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's only one of his many trial balloons.
This one caught my eye:

In my long experience in Washington, few matters have inspired so much contrived indignation and phony moralizing as the interrogation methods applied to a few captured terrorists. --Dick Cheney, between babies

After seven-and-a-half years of the and bluster about getting tough on terrorism, see, he's also preparing the framing that there were just a few bad, bad men tortured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You missed Cheney's main point, they are not human, they are "terrorists"
Humans have rights, unlike witches, terrorists, pagans, infidels, heretics,
and in Latin America in recent decades, liberals, social activists, Natives, Sandinistas (the 1980s terrorists), labor unions, ....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That was impossible to miss, with all due respect.
That thread runs through his every other sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. And the few bad, bad men tortured were tortured by a few, very few, bad apples, and we got
great intelligence from it, so what's the big?

I dare to hope Cheney may actually stand trial for this (and multitudinous other crimes), if not here, then in some country that gives a damn (Spain?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinJapan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. MY question is...why is the justice department not investigating him?
I guess "too big to fail" doesn't apply only to gigantic corporations, but also gigantic politicians.

If they ever truly investigated the guy, the President would be forced to pardon him (and his boss), right?

And that wouldn't work.

So, smile and move on. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC