http://www.vetvoice.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2824That oughta do it. Thanks very much, Ray.
by: Brandon Friedman
Thu May 28, 2009 at 03:17:14 AM EDT
Faced with an alarming number of soldiers taking their own lives at Ft. Campbell, the commander of the 101st Airborne set out on Wednesday to put a stop to the suicides. To kick off a three-day "stand-down," Brig. Gen. Stephen J.
Townsend essentially ordered troops on post not to commit suicide. While I don't have his complete remarks, here are some provided by CNN:
"If you don't remember anything else I say in the next five or 10 minutes, remember this -- suicidal behavior in the 101st on Fort Campbell is bad," Brig. Gen. Stephen J. Townsend told his forces. "It's bad for soldiers, it's bad for families, bad for your units, bad for this division and our army and our country and it's got to stop now. Suicides on Fort Campbell have to stop now."
"Suicide is a permanent solution to what is only a temporary problem," Townsend said. "Screaming Eagles don't quit. No matter how bad your problem seems today, trust me, it's not the end of the world. It will be better tomorrow. Don't take away your tomorrow."
He urged anyone feeling hopeless or suicidal to "tell somebody."
"You wouldn't hesitate to seek medical attention for a physical injury or wound; don't hesitate to seek medical attention for a psychological injury."
"Don't let yourself, your buddies or your families down," he said, ending his comments by repeating, "This has got to stop, soldiers. It's got to stop now. Have a great week."
snip//
If I'm suicidally depressed over the fact that my wife just left me and took the kids after telling me she cheated throughout my entire third deployment, I'm just not hearing Brig. Gen. Townsend. This is just more evidence that the Army is in denial--at least publicly--over what this epidemic is all about. It's not something you solve with a "buddy system" or by telling soldiers it's "bad for the division."These are deep-seated problems born of an organization that uproots it members every other year, takes them away from their families, and places them in life-threatening combat for 12 or 15 months at a time. I'm not suggesting these soldiers didn't volunteer for exactly that, but I am saying it shouldn't come as a surprise to senior leaders that this might be one effect. Of course, "winning" the wars may be another effect, so maybe it's worth it. I'm not judging. I'm just saying let's drop the denial and be up front about what the costs and benefits are to maintaining an op-tempo like this. And then, let's address them. Because only by getting to the root of the problem--the op-tempo--will we be able to lower the number of unnecessary deaths within the ranks.