Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wikipedia Bans Scientology From Site

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:45 AM
Original message
Wikipedia Bans Scientology From Site


Exclusive In an unprecedented effort to crack down on self-serving edits, the Wikipedia supreme court has banned contributions from all IP addresses owned or operated by the Church of Scientology and its associates.

Closing out the longest-running court case in Wikiland history, the site’s Arbitration Committee voted 10 to 0 (with one abstention) in favor of the move, which takes effect immediately.

The eighth most popular site on the web, Wikipedia bills itself as "the free encyclopedia anyone can edit." Administrators frequently ban individual Wikifiddlers for their individual Wikisins. And the site's UK press officer/resident goth once silenced an entire Utah mountain in a bizarre attempt to protect a sockpuppeting ex-BusinessWeek reporter. But according to multiple administrators speaking with The Reg, the muzzling of Scientology IPs marks the first time Wikipedia has officially barred edits from such a high-profile organization for allegedly pushing its own agenda on the site.

Officially, Wikipedia frowns on those who edit "in order to promote their own interests." The site sees itself as an encyclopedia with a "neutral point of view" - whatever that is. "Use of the encyclopedia to advance personal agendas – such as advocacy or propaganda and philosophical, ideological or religious dispute – or to publish or promote original research is prohibited," say the Wikipowersthatbe.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/29/wikipedia_bans_scientology/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good...insane people shouldn't be allowed to edit this site...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. They should bar the christians too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good for Wiki!
Tom and his buddies need to leave that good site alone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow.
A) Excellent news B) Hopefully the United States will ban this "religion" someday but I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I doubt it too
even though it's a giant fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. All religions are n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. I don't agree with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Like you anyway, Lost
It's just an opinion. I won't try to defend it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPedigrees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. "The way to get rich is to start a religion." L Ron Hubbard
He made that statement back in the late 60s, published in a small local paper in Boston. Sure enough, it worked for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. That's another strike against this monstrosity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. (shrug) Religion and facts don't mix. This is well-known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Neither do cults and facts! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Tomato, tomato.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. True. I prefer to make the distinction. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good...
Now they should do the same to known Islamist, Juche, and fundamentalist Christian organisations. These wackos have no place corrupting an encylcopedia of the people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. Wikip*dia didn't target a "religion" (read: cult) they upheld their policy.
A policy that is created by the community.

As members of the community, the cult couldn't muster enough support to alter the guidelines. Too bad for them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. Gee... it'll take a real talented Scientology geek to figure out a way around that!
Like maybe using an outside Internet connection instead of doing it through a Scientology IP address?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. The problem with that is outside connections don't have the cult's filters. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cpompilo Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. They banned a "religion" based on a sci-fi novel - awesome!
Another wacko religion with self aggrandizing "we are the chosen" nuts. Good for Wikipedia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Hubbard reputedly lifted the name "Scientology" from a 1934 German book
The book "Scientology: Science of the Constitution and Usefulness of Knowledge" was first published in 1934 by the Publishing House "Ernst Reinhardt" in Munich, Germany.

Because of the name similarity and parallels in content to the philosophy of L. Ron Hubbard's "Scientology", the Free Zone Association (Freie Zone e.V.) decided to preserve this book by republishing it in its original context. It is available in German and English.

http://www.scientologie.org/english.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. 1934...
Any relationship to the Nazis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. ban one ban them all.
Edited on Fri May-29-09 02:50 PM by dbonds
They are all equally as nutty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. Technically, no. They banned sockpuppets pushing edits violating their NPOV policy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. First the Wikipedists came for the Scientologists, and I didn't speak because I was not one.
Edited on Fri May-29-09 11:14 AM by Oregone
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. LOL! That's funny! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. Too bad that Germany is the only country with the balls to refuse to call it a religion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Co$ is a pyramid scheme
Plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comrade snarky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. Cue Scientology apologists
In 3, 2, 1...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. BWAHAHAHAHAHA! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
30. I applaud them for banning
them but it will take a not even too smart scientologist to keep on editing -

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC