Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Concerning Health Care costs is this statement true?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:36 AM
Original message
Concerning Health Care costs is this statement true?
This is part of a response I got from another question I asked about health care costs. Do you believe this statement is true?

"The insurers negotiate special rates with providers that are much less than their regular rates."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. That looks a bit like a half truth. It is true that Medicaid and Medicare
set a base rate for services and it is usually less than what the provider pays. But this statement makes it sound like private insurers are the ones saving us money. I doubt that is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vicman Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Insurance companies definitely do
force providers (mostly hospitals and clinics) to accept the least payments possible. The providers adjust delivery of care to operate within the constraints they are made to accept. In response to a class action lawsuit filed several years ago over the inherent unfairness of the multitiered payment system, most hospitals now offer discounts to self pay patients. If you can pay your entire hospital bill within thirty days, the discount is as high as 20%. This is not about saving money for the insurance companies customers. It's about increasing profits for the insurers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. The statement is true.
And I have a stack of insurance statements to back me up.

These agreements save the insurers billions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. True. Turning Drs offices into billing mills.
I don't do insurance. If the patients want to use theirs, fine, pay the office, then they can file the paperwork. (Or, they can hire a claims specialist to work at my office.) After all, its their insurance not mine.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Interesting response
What I am trying to do is both understand the complexity of the cost of health care and who or what moderates or extends those costs and understand how people perceive the 'health care industry'. So far almost all I see are contradictions on the perception side and no understanding of the root cost of health care on the business side. I'll just keep on asking questions until it makes sense.

Your response is an out-lier (no idea how to spell that and the checker is of no help) of course but its the most interesting response I have seen yet (with one possible exception). I suspect that if your (I presume you are a practicing physician) approach, if it were to be the norm, would drive down the cost of health care in this country and concurrently be very likely to bring the matter of a broken health care system to quick end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thom, I'm not in it to get rich.
I live moderately. Spend about a week a month doing clinic work. My private practice is high-end expensive. My wealthy patients subsidize care given to the less fortunate.

I feel far more rewarded working like this.

I'm in the health care field, not the health 'I don't care' business.

Cheers.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I don't knowif you've seen this article yet, but it hs some great insights
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Many states have laws
that require equal pricing of health care services. A few years back the Wall Street Journal did a front page series comparing pricing of health care services. Needless to say, it is not equal.

Too bad we have spineless bought and paid for attorney generals who are unwilling to enforce those laws. Fucking bastards. Every damn one of them should be removed from office and thrown in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. Just look at your bills
The doctor charges a fee.

On your bill it will say something like "adjustment". That's the amount the insurance company will pay the doctor.

So you'' get something like this.

5/29/09 labwork $ 345

insurance adjustment $ 210

fee charged $ 135

insurance paid $ 109

patient pays $ 26

If a doctor thinks the insurance adjustments are not reasonable, then he doesn't accept that insurance. Many doctors are not accepting Blue Cross / Blue Shield for that reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. Logically speaking, in the big scheme of things, for profit insurance corporations must drive up the
Edited on Sat May-30-09 11:14 AM by Uncle Joe
cost in order to profit from their gambling on the people's illness and or injury. Some of this profit is needed to bribe the politicians to keep the doctors, nurses and others advocating national universal health care from even having a seat at the table.

The insurance corporations may on the short end negotiate lower prices for the insured but the prices are primarily high because 40+ million Americans are uninsured and I believe 50+ million are under-insured, so any cost cutting to the insured is an illusion. Too many people can't afford to pay the middle man, and people having nothing to do with actual health care rake in millions if not billions. I believe the for profit "health" insurance model to be a major contributor to the high foreclosure rate.

I believe one misconception many people have regarding for profit health insurance is that it profits from people's health, I see the opposite effect, they profit from illness and injury.

Supply and demand, virtually everybody gets sick or injured at some point their life, this is the inevitable demand that insurance corporations need to sell their product if nobody got sick or injured there would be no demand, their business would dry up. When demand outstrips supply; premiums escalate through the roof far outstripping inflation, I believe this is what the nation has and will be more acutely experiencing as the population ages.

I also believe for a corporation; having nothing to do with health care to profit from the American Peoples' injury and illness to be as immoral and carcinogenic to society as for profit prisons making money by imprisoning the people.

My conclusion is that if the American People were universally covered by the government and health care were treated as a national asset instead of legalized corporate sponsored gambling, the prices would drop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Think about it...if most people are insured, what are "regular rates"?
Its all sort of a bullshit statement. If you aren't insured, you get charged arbitrarily high magic rates. Most insured cannot pay them, so the health care facility gets a big whopping tax write-off for the amount they forgive, and they send the smaller portion to collection and still get paid. The write-off they get may potentially amount to more savings in taxes than they would of gotten paid in the first place if the person was insured.

So, what I am trying to say, is that there is no true baseline "regular" rates. Hence, no money really being saved with these negotiators (and single-payer negotiates too). The norm is the lower "special rates" (which are high and profitable in the first place). The "regular rates" are probably irregularly ever paid in full and they serve other purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 18th 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC