Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Five Votes Will Now Decide Minnesota Senate Race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 02:55 PM
Original message
Five Votes Will Now Decide Minnesota Senate Race
Minnesota's Senate race now comes down to 5 votes

By PAT DOYLE, Star Tribune

Last update: May 30, 2009 - 10:11 PM



Now it comes down to five votes.

Almost seven months after a U.S. Senate election that was too close to call, five justices of the Minnesota Supreme Court will hear arguments Monday on whether problems with absentee ballots justify reversing a lower-court ruling that declared DFLer Al Franken a 312-vote winner over Republican Norm Coleman.

Partisans across America will be watching, pronouncing judgment on a thousand blogs. The case may cast a blinding national spotlight on the state Supreme Court.

A decision upholding the lower-court ruling could end the protracted struggle and allow Franken to join the Senate, giving Democrats an invincible majority. A ruling for Coleman wouldn't return him to the Senate, but could keep his hopes alive and delay a final decision for months.

Minnesotans want the dispute to end, recent polls show. Most people say Coleman should concede. Nearly two-thirds believe that Franken ultimately will be declared the winner.

But several former Minnesota Supreme Court justices say current members will consider the case carefully, ignoring outside publicity and pressure.

"The impatience of the people just has to be put aside," said former Associate Justice Jim Gilbert, who served on the court for seven years with most of the justices hearing the case. "You want a correct decision at this stage, not a fast decision.

more...

http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/senate/46508587.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUac8HEaDiaMDCinchO7DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is this court impartial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We can hope. I don't know, but we may find out soon. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. "...giving the Democrats an invincible majority..."
In your dreams. There may well be 60 people who identify themselves as members of the Democratic Party in the Senate, but with the Blue Dogs, Joe Lieberman, Arlen Spectre, etc., there isn't the guaranteed block of votes for liberal issues that the lock-step Repugs would have. We'll have to fight our way though every progressive issue -- health care, Iraq, environment -- just as if the GOP still held the majority, and in the end we'll have watered-down bills which will be written for the most part by the corporations. It'll just take them a little longer to get their way than it did when the Repugs held power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Too close to call"? But I thought they did call it?
Coleman just didn't like the call. So now he gets a "do-over"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Coleman kept wanting every ballot counted, just after saying no ballot should be counted due to cost
Too right he should concede.

Therefore, he's gonna win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. the minnesota supreme court takes up this case tomorrow morning @ 9:00am cst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Again, it's time to hear from some MN DUers who actually know the judges and the facts
as opposed to the speculative opinions we read from other DUers based only on what they think. This is the MN Supreme Court that named the 3 judge panel for this case, each of whose rulings were unanimous. I anticipate a very fair decision from a very honest court that is held in high esteem regardless of their party affiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC