Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When’s a Worker a Contractor? When the Boss Wants to Cheat.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 07:45 PM
Original message
When’s a Worker a Contractor? When the Boss Wants to Cheat.

http://www.labornotes.org/2010/03/when%E2%80%99s-worker-contractor-when-boss-wants-cheat

Enku Ide | April 5, 2010

Everyone wants to “be his own boss,” right? That’s the American dream, we’re told. But when a real boss tells a worker she’s not an employee but an independent contractor—it’s simply a way to steal wages and cheat on taxes.

Worker centers in many states are seeking state and national legislation to strike back at such thieving bosses. And some lawmakers, with budgets strapped by the recession, are keen to find ways to haul in tax-shirking employers.


Worker centers, like Chicago's Arise, are striking back at employers who cheat employees by labeling them "independent contractors," and are finding support from lawmakers keen to haul in tax-shirking employers. Photo: Arise.


Mislabeled workers “suffer the worst of both worlds” according to the worker-rights advocacy group American Rights at Work. Not only do they lack control over their work, they are denied legal protections due to workers, including unemployment insurance, overtime pay, anti-discrimination laws, minimum wage requirements, and workers’ compensation.

The Department of Labor investigated nine states in 2000 and found that up to 30 percent of employees were misclassified, with about 3.4 million illegally called contractors. One study found this practice cost the federal government as much as $34.7 billion in taxes between 1996 and 2004.

Dozens of states are taking notice, too. In New York—where an estimated 10 percent of private sector employees are labeled contractors—state attorneys found that employers used the ruse to steal more than $12 million from workers in 2007. Ohio estimates a loss of $361 million per year from unpaid taxes and workers’ comp premiums.

In Austin, Texas, where up to 38 percent of construction workers are wrongly classified, the scam has cost the state more than $8 million in taxes and unemployment contributions, according to a study published last June by the Workers Defense Project.

FULL story at link.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
earthboundmisfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
This is for damn sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. damn right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Didn't Michael Moore even have an issue with NBC when he found
that many of the full time workers at the morning show (probably NBC wide, I'd be curious if folks like Rachel and Keith buck them on this), anyway, Moore had returned for an interview and found that many of the behind the scenes employees are contract with no benefits and no payroll taxes being paid, no overtime either, even though they had worked full time at NBC since the last time he had been there which was about 7 years or something?

It's bad, so is the "salary" aspect. There is pretty strict wording in my opinion on that also, but many corps put their people on salary so they can be required to work well over 40hours a week with no additional pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC