Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An interesting story about Ronald Reagan that you won't hear very much about in the 'liberal' media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 08:38 PM
Original message
An interesting story about Ronald Reagan that you won't hear very much about in the 'liberal' media
Edited on Tue Apr-06-10 08:55 PM by ck4829
From:
"The President's Speech" from
The Man who Mistook his Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks

What was going on? A roar of laughter from the aphasia ward, just as the President's speech was coming on, and they had all been so eager to hear the President speaking...

There he was, the old Charmer, the Actor, with his practised rhetoric, his histrionisms, his emotional appeal - and all the patients were convulsed with laughter. Well, not all: some looked bewildered, some looked outraged, one or two looked apprehensive, but most looked amused. The President was, as always, moving - but he was moving them, apparently, mainly to laughter. What could they be thinking? Were they failing to understand him? Or did they, perhaps, understand him all too well?

It was often said of these patients, who though intelligent had the severest receptive or global aphasia, rendering them incapable of understanding words as such, that they none the less understood most of what was said to them. Their friends, their relatives, the nurses who knew them well, could hardly believe, sometimes, that they were aphasic.

(Why were they reacting in such a strange way? One of the patients was able to explain it.)

Emily D. also listened, stony-faced, to the President's speech, bringing to it a strange mixture of enhanced and defective perceptions - precisely the opposite mixture to those of our aphasiacs. It did not move her - no speech now moved her - and all that was evocative, genuine or false completely passed her by. Deprived of emotional reaction, was she then (like the rest of us) transported or taken in? By no means. 'He is not cogent,' she said. 'He does not speak good prose. His word-use is improper. Either he is brain- damaged, or he has something to conceal.'

http://junkfoodforthought.com/long/Sacks_Reagan.htm

While a lot of 'normal' Americans were responding to Reagan's speech with "I wanna have a beer with him!" and "I just feel so safe with Reagan that I just want him to hold me in his arms!", all of these 'crazies' and 'loons', because they couldn't see the meaning of words and had to look almost exclusively at prose and body language, couldn't believe the fantastic lies they were being told live on TV by the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dhill926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. very interesting....thanks....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftWingPunk Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. i highly doubt that Reagan would want anything to do with McCartney
remember he was a democrat until 1962. Thats why he got so many democrats to vote for him as president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You're kidding right? Reagan was a informer for J. Edgar Hoover for years in Hollywood.
And he ratted out everyone he could. As did Robert Taylor, his old actor buddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wonder how many of his "fans" know he was a squealer to the McCarthy HUAC Hearings.
Edited on Tue Apr-06-10 08:47 PM by BrklynLiberal
He gave names, dates and anything else that would save his own ass.

Reagan was considered a "friendly" witness.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6458
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick for later
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC