Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wilkerson's Sworn Declaraton:"I Served An Admin That Tortured/Abused Innocent For Political Reasons"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:35 PM
Original message
Wilkerson's Sworn Declaraton:"I Served An Admin That Tortured/Abused Innocent For Political Reasons"
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 03:42 PM by kpete
Hey folks, I think Wilkerson’s sworn declaration is much better reading than the stories that have been published, much of which is based off the Times of London story, which is not very good, IMO.

I’ve uploaded a link to his declaration here: http://www.truthout.org/files/Wilkerson.pdf
and here is a copy of the lawsuit which it was filed in support of (which also names Geoffrey Miller): http://www.truthout.org/files/hassanvgates.pdf

Having been a military officer for 30 years, I knew to start at the beginning so I started immediately to investigate our detention policies from the very start of the war in Afghanistan. During my investigation, I discovered that U.S. forces had murdered two Bagram detainees at Bagram airbase, in about December 2002, very close in time to when Mr. Hamad was apparently in custody there. I recalled my service in Vietnam and what a great challenge it was to stop troops from committing war crimes against captives, or during combat, and how to have such things happening as a matter of policy was very destructive.


Also, Wilkerson explains:

I have made a personal choice to come forward and discuss the abuses that occurred because knowledge that I served in an Administration that tortured and abused those it detained at the facilities at Guantánamo Bay and elsewhere and indefinitely detained the innocent for political reasons has marked a low point in my professional career and I wish to make the record clear on what occurred. I am also extremely concerned that the Armed Forces of the United States, where I spent 31 years of my professional life, were deeply involved in these tragic mistakes. I am willing to testify in person regarding the content of this declaration, should that be necessary.

and:

According to the declaration, he disclosed the discussions that took place with Powell so in that sense Powell is already implicated in that he is named, albeit he is portrayed as innocent (although that may be the wrong word to use)


http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2010/04/09/wilkerson-cheney-and-rummy-knew-gitmo-detainees-were-innocent/

http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2010/04/09/wilkerson-cheney-and-rummy-knew-gitmo-detainees-were-innocent/#comment-229448


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wilkerson's "Come To Jesus" moment coupled with the reincarnation of
General Smedley Darlington Butler's treatise, "War Is A Racket".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. The declaration is nine double-spaced pages long
Click on the .pdf link and indulge a nauseating read. I'll excerpt just one small part:

"My own view is that it was easy for Vice President Cheney to run circles around President Bush bureaucratically because Cheney had the network within the government to do so. Moreover, by exploiting what Secretary Powell called the President's 'cowboy instincts,' Vice President Cheney could more often than not gain the President's acquiescence."

Lucky for the United States, all of this is just water under the bridge or over the dam or down the drain, so we shouldn't worry our pretty little heads about the war crimes detailed in Mr. Wilkerson's declaration. It would be too political, and tear the country apart. So much preferable to wait until the survivors of our crimes grow tired of waiting for us to police ourselves, and exact their own righteous retribution. Of course, if they're a little sloppy in their selection of targets, you don't mind dying for the crimes of the Bush administration, do you? Or if a relative, friend or other loved one gets his or her ticket punched, you're okay with that, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No, I'm not OK with that.
Just so ya know. Doubt many others are either.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Word for Powell is "Disingenuous"
dis·in·genu·ous (dis′in jen′yo̵̅o̅ əs)

adjective

1. not straightforward; not candid or frank; insincere
2. slyly deceptive or misleading, typically by means of a pretense of ignorance or unawareness

or

dis·in·gen·u·ous
Pronunciation: \ˌdis-in-ˈjen-yə-wəs, -yü-əs-\
Function: adjective
Date: 1655

: lacking in candor; also : giving a false appearance of simple frankness : calculating
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yawn...
Didja see Tiger tee off the other day?

Now, THAT'S news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC