Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Rush Ignorantly Wonders ‘Where Was The Union’ At Non-Union Mine Disaster"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:44 PM
Original message
"Rush Ignorantly Wonders ‘Where Was The Union’ At Non-Union Mine Disaster"
I usually skip the Rush stories, but this one was unbelievable.

Rush Ignorantly Wonders ‘Where Was The Union’ At Non-Union Mine Disaster

Last Friday, Rush Limbaugh asked why a coal miner union didn’t protect the 29 miners who were killed when Massey Energy’s Upper Big Branch Mine in Montcoal, WV, exploded under unsafe conditions:

Was there no union responsibility for improving mine safety? Where was the union here? Where was the union? The union is generally holding these companies up demanding all kinds of safety. Why were these miners continuing to work in what apparently was an unsafe atmosphere?

There’s a simple reason the union didn’t protect the miners: the Upper Big Branch Mine, like nearly all of the mines under Massey CEO Don Blankenship’s control, is non-union. In fact, the United Mine Workers of America (UMW) “tried three times to organize the Upper Big Branch mine, but even with getting nearly 70 percent of workers to sign cards saying they wanted to vote for a union, Blankenship personally met with workers to threaten them with closing down the mine and losing their jobs if they voted for a union.”

Blankenship rose in Massey’s ranks by breaking its union mines in the 1980s. Blankenship said then that busting unions is “invaluable” to profits, as non-union companies can “sell coal cheaper and drive union coal out of business.”

Union mines have a significantly better safety record than non-union mines especially for major disasters, as union miners can refuse unsafe work and report dangerous conditions without fear of retaliation. In addition to preventing Blankenship-style intimidation, the proposed Employee Free Choice Act would increase whistleblower protections for non-union and union workers alike. Under Blankenship’s direction, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Mining Association have spent millions to oppose passage of such legislation for worker rights, comparing it to a “firestorm bordering on Armageddon.”

http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/04/13/limbaugh-disaster-union/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I read stuff like this, and I can't even write what I want to happen to that drug-addled shitstain.
Being killed in a mine explosion is too good an end to the likes of Asspimple.

I will personally dance a jig the day he joins Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. now now, you gotta rise above it..
.... we're Democrats, we dont think/act/speak like the teabaggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I was also a Union man.
I'll also do a Virginia Reel, right after the jig.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I say it again, I hope Blankenship is headed for indictment.
"Blankenship said then that busting unions is “invaluable” to profits, as non-union companies can “sell coal cheaper" In this is why there should be Unions in every work place so we can control assholes like Blankenship who could give a rats ass about his employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. It isn't ignorance.
It is deliberate misrepresentation of material facts.

Commonly know as lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. You're right.
Thanks for saving me the headwork of having to try to explain this once again. When it comes to Republicans and their mouthpieces, never attribute to mere stupidity anything that is better explained by psychopathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd say he can't be that pin-headed
But he's proved me wrong so many times before that I don't say that anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. He didn't prove you wrong. See above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. According to Olbermann tonight they wouldn't even let union people in
to help with the attempt to rescue the miners.

Why this SOB isn't up on criminal charges, I cannot understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I can answer that in one character.
$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC