Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Top Fed Official Calls For U.S. To Break Up Megabanks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 07:28 PM
Original message
Another Top Fed Official Calls For U.S. To Break Up Megabanks
Referring to the danger posed by megabanks as one that's able to spread "debilitating viruses throughout the financial world," a second top Federal Reserve official called for policymakers to bust up the nation's financial behemoths before they cause another worldwide financial crisis.

Richard W. Fisher, president and chief executive of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, told a gathering of economists and financial experts Wednesday that "a truly effective restructuring of our regulatory system will have to neutralize what I consider to be the greatest threat to our financial system's stability... 'too big to fail'."

"In the past two decades, the biggest banks have grown significantly bigger," Fisher said in New York during a lunchtime speech that elicited rounds of applause. "The average size of U.S. banks relative to gross domestic product has risen threefold. The share of industry assets for the 10 largest banks climbed from almost 25 percent in 1990 to almost 60 percent in 2009.

"Existing rules and oversight are not up to the acute regulatory challenge imposed by the biggest banks," he said. So U.S. policymakers, along with their international counterparts, should come up with a system that will break them down into a manageable, less-risky size.<snip>

More at link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/14/another-top-fed-official_n_537934.html

Well worth the read. Fisher makes the case for this very effectively and debunks the arguments against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Too big to fail" is a gun to our heads.
Thank you for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babyblonde Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. too big to EVAH
succeed:nuke: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Re-instate Glass-Steagall is litmus test for too-big-to fail nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC