Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goldman Sachs lost $14.2 Billion today in market capitalization

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:38 PM
Original message
Goldman Sachs lost $14.2 Billion today in market capitalization
Share price fell from about $184 to $160 in one day, a market cap loss of $14.2 billion in one day! :rofl:

There's probably more to come as we hear the drip drip of information and possible criminal charges filed.

Today is a good day :toast:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ipDnnshAQtirbhEWnmf0JPf8ZTngD9F4E2500
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I give that other shoe until around Wednesday next....LOL...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. there is an old trader saw that is pretty useful
"as goes the pig, so goes the poke"

the pig are the financials

the poke is the market.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. PigMen Shafted, Russian Escorts Stranded in Europe, Hamptons Weekend Ruined
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. that's a very good site
thanks for the link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Although I would love to join you in a chortle,
Haven't the actions of this Administration and the Bush Administration's money people (Paulson, Geithner, Bernanke et al.) proven that if GS should fail, we tax payers will be forced once again to just BAIL THEM out!?!

After all, they are TOO BIG TO FAIL, right?

Let me know if they don't force us to make up the fourteen billion - I will definitely
be happy as spiked punch to share a :toast: with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. It would be shocking to see a push for another bailout at this point
unless all our legislators and the administration have decided that unemployment looks attractive to them. I know I've seen some shady crap out of Washington the past couple of years but this would stun me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. The whole idea of "Reform" and "Regulation" to
Edited on Sat Apr-17-10 02:39 PM by truedelphi
me is so bogus. The Health Care Giveaways in the recent "Reform" package for the Health Insurance Industry clearly indicate to me what "Reform" is all about. (And the huge surge in stock market prices after the bill was voted in clearly say volumes about what the HC"R" was all about.)

There is a pattern here. As an anti- pesticide activist, from about 1991, I watched as someone in Congress would bring forth a bill that stipulated for harsh regulations on pesticide/herbicide manufacturers. Then the lobbyists show up at the Capital building and the lunch discussion begin, and the legislation would be watered down.

So to me, "Reform" equals legislators getting their need for campaign contributions met. While insuring that industry has the "Reform" structured to their liking.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Except for those funds that have to invest a percent in S&P 500 companies
and except for people whose 401ks are composed of those funds.

Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Don't invest in criminal companies and maybe that won't happen
Lesson learned. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Would you be willing to give me $100 in cash if it meant a GS exec would lose $1 million?
Odds are, you wouldn't. And there are millions of people who contribute to 401ks invested in funds that invest in GS.

:hi: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. First of all, the S&P is made up of 500 companies...
It's unliekly that Goldman Sachs alone will dramatically affect the value of an index fund like the SPY.

Secondly, if people are directly invested in Goldman Sachs, perhaps they should re-balance their portfolios and invest in good solid companies that aren't criminal, like Apple? :shrug:

If you invest in a criminal enterprise, you will be burned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Hahahahahahahahah painfully naive.
I made money on Enron. I made money on GS. I made money on Worldcom. I made money on Ford and GM.

Going long on each, not short. Show me my burn marks, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I wasn't referring to you specifically.
I don't know what or how you're invested and I really don't care. You're the one who was worried about Goldman Sachs shareholders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Actually, I am worried about GS shareholders.
And I'll be goddamned if I'm going to feel bad about it. Were ALL Enron shareholders evil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. They'll never understand the stock market here so no sense arguing
with people about it. I'm sure everyone here is benefiting from GS somehow but just not as visibly as buying and selling their stocks.

As for the GS stock, this seems like a great buy opportunity. It may keep going down the first part of next week but within a couple of weeks these losses should all be made up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. You're sure everyone here on DU is benefiting from Goldman somehow?
Edited on Fri Apr-16-10 06:10 PM by Cali_Democrat
Do you realize the damage that was caused to this economy when Goldman sold those mortgage investments? Then you have the nerve to say we are benefiting?

Puuulease :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Do you own any kind of insurance or a house or a car or do you eat food or buy gas?
Chances are if you do any of those things, which I guess it's true that maybe you don't, but if you do then you are helping to support GS every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. So how is Goldman benefiting me? Sure I might be benefiting those vampires
What do they do for me? :shrug:

I know for one thing I pay through the nose at the pump because of artificially inflated gas prices because of Goldman Sachs speculation...

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/108382
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grand Taurean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. GS is a parasite on the system.
Any bad news for GS is good news for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. What a shame!
:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unabelladonna Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. a world without GS....
we can only hope. i'd love to see an en masse bankruptcy filing by these roaches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm also pleased that GOLD took a big hit today.


How does that feel Faux viewers?

You're right, days don't get much better than this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Honestly, I just giggled a little bit when I read this.
Very amusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. So, does this mean
the CEO will only get 50 million this year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Ooopsie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Too big to jail..er..fail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. Well, dern. Gosh golly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greencharlie Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. you mean the Ponzi scheme investors lost 14.2B nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. Wow, thanks for this information....
now can you please explain to everyone why this doesn't mean anything or should I?

Well you see people...a large drop like this is typically caused by fear due to a news story and doesn't really reflect on the value of the company in relation to its stock price. Within a few weeks all of these losses will be gained again and it'll probably still keep going up. Or it'll go down. That's what the market does is it fluctuates with one day or week gains or losses which are only really taken seriously by alarmists and the news media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
28. Over reaction.
Edited on Fri Apr-16-10 06:39 PM by Turbineguy
It will probably be settled. It's a billion dollars. GS will have to cough up the amount the US Taxpayers gave to the European banks that lost on this transaction and covered their risk with AIG.

But if it helps push through derivatives regulation, I'm all for it.

A lot of people around here seem to delight in ordinary people losing value in their pension funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. "delight in ordinary people losing value in their pension funds"
It's time to clean out the crooks. If pension funds are making money off companies engaging in criminal practices, that's a damned shame. But not an excuse for allowing it to continue. If a lot of people were making money off murder for hire, would we allow it to continue so those ordinary people don't lose value? I'm sick of it and it needs to be stopped. A lot of people have lost money over the games the financial institutions have been playing. Time to get rid of TBTF and time to regulate the markets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. didn't the union leaders face RICO for
investing pension funds in Las Vegas thru some shady deals with some shady characters? Aside from the nice white shirts and 3K suits, what's the difference here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. There is no difference at all anymore.
As I have often said as I watched the meager amounts I was able to save tank in the cyclical crashes, "I can lose my money at the Peppermill (Reno) all by myself and have more fun doing it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
33. The big guys at Goldman likely shorted their company and made billions on this.
Really, they'd do anything for a billion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
34. Sounds like bonus time again!
If a day ends with "day" then it's bonus day for the wall street crew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
35. Letting ultra-capitalists near the money is like letting the Pope near children
Edited on Sat Apr-17-10 04:00 PM by underpants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. That really nails it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
36. if their stock tanks enough do they qualify for a bailout?
how much $$ do they have to lose before they are "too big to fail"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC