Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mysterious X-37B unmanned space shuttle launched by U.S. ... and they won't say what it's for Read

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Synicus Maximus Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:41 PM
Original message
Mysterious X-37B unmanned space shuttle launched by U.S. ... and they won't say what it's for Read
Source: mail online

It looks like the space shuttle's more diminutive cousin - but experts say it was created with technology from a generation beyond.

The U.S. military launched the mysterious X-37B unmanned winged spacecraft last night - but what America plans to do with it there is anyone's guess.

The mission has been wrapped in secrecy from the get-go. The Air Force said the launch was a success but would give no details of the mission's progress.

'Well, you can't hide a space launch, so at some point extra security doesn't do you any good,' said Gary Payton, Air Force deputy under secretary for space systems, in a Tuesday teleconference with reporters.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1268138/X-37B-unmanned-space-shuttle-launched-tonight.html#ixzz0lt4e7vAu


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1268138/X-37B-unmanned-space-shuttle-launched-tonight.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps we DUers should bombard Obama demanding he tell us why as CIC he's experimenting with
X-37B?

On the other hand Obama might be in the same position as Jimmy Carter who canceled the first B-1 because the most secret R&D project that produced the F-117 was within months of completion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The B-1 was canned because it was utter crap
My father was in one the SAC evaluation teams which basically told Rockwell to stick that piece of garbage up where the sun don't shine. It was one of the most spectacular wastes of tax payer money up to that point. No wonder Rumsfeld thought of it as one of his personal pet projects (My dad actually has a picture of Rumsfeld with him when he visited Edwards, little did he know how much he would come to loathe that guy 3 decades later, but even then he gave indications of being an utter prick according to my old man, I don't know in what capacity Rumsfeld was serving with the pentagon in the mid 70s but he was overseeing some programs back then).

A lot of people, who actually were doing the right thing, had their careers in the pentagon ended the minute Raygun become president. The military contractors sent a clear signal that anyone who fucks with them inside the pentagon will pay dire consequences, now that a MiC friendly admin was in charge. And thus, witness the insane amount of useless programs Raygun brought forth. The B-1 took almost 3 decades to become fully functional, and meet the basic specs set for it in the late 60s. The US was able to build the atomic bomb in 1/10th of the time than it took for the B-1 to fly correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. He was Secretary of Defense in the Ford administration.
He wasn't just overseeing some programs, he was running the whole Defense department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
25. Carter dropped the B-1 because of the F-117. You heard from your father, I was there. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
14thColony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #25
43. I'm a bit confused
And perhaps I'm misunderstanding you. The F-117 and the B-1 (A or B models) were designed for very different roles: tactical attack/strike versus strategic strike. An F-117 can't carry nearly as much nearly as far nor nearly as fast as a B-1A. The ONLY thing it had going for it over the B-1A was first generation stealth tech. To say the B-1A was canx for the F-117 implies the F-117 was going to have a strategic role and would be a SAC asset like the FB-111A, which was never the intention and was never the case -- the F-117 just can't go far enough to make it useful in anything but the most limited strategic strike role. Did you perhaps mean B-1A versus B-2?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. The F-117 demonstrated the viability of stealth technology that produced the B-2 making the B-1
versions obsolete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lagomorph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
48. I made parts for it.
We built 100 sets of parts and that was the end of it. Production was shut down before the first production plane (B-1B) was built.

When the last plane came off the line, the tooling was destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
38. Yeah. That'll show him what's what!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. NASA is out of teh manned space business...
Ain't no way the Air Force is giving that up. This was a canceled NASA project the Air Force picked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unmanned?
But what do ya bet it can carry a cargo of humans?

A mini-shuttle makes good sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Not big enough. I'd say it's an EZ-launch surveillance satellite.
The previous photoreconaissance satellites were either large (KH-11) or limited in capability (Corona).

This one could be launched with a smaller rocket than the KH series, and landed back fairly quickly (with some interesting
photos, no doubt).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
30. Definitely possible.
There was a reason why the Keyholes were big - physics of telescopes dictate that if you want a good image, you need a big mirror, and the Keyhole was essentially a telescope roughly equivalent to the Hubble Space Telescope, only designed to be pointed at Earth.

Maybe they could do it smaller with newer satellites - instead of a huge glass mirror, maybe a unfoldable mirror made of thin foil, that's dynamically adjustable for better focusing capability.

Do bear in mind that the X-37B is not that big - the payload bay is about 7 feet long.

I'd guess that the Air Force had anti-satellite technology in mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Dyna-soar redux?
I think that's where it is headed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. A rendezvous with aliens in space?
That's the rumor I'm starting;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hestia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Or getting off the planet first, just in case...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
31. I. for one, welcome our new space alien rendezvous overlords
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 04:00 AM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeloo Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. wrapped in secrecy..I googled it and found thousands of articles..
The United States Air Force plans to launch its first robotic X-37B space plane Thursday on a mission that is a forerunner of things to come. A second mini-space plane is already under contract and is projected to be launched next year.

New details regarding the mini-space plane and its upcoming Thursday liftoff atop an Atlas 5 booster were discussed today during a U.S. Air Force-held media press briefing.

The X-37B vehicle's history stretches back to the late 90s, with NASA kick-starting the project. It was later picked up by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and ultimately found a home within the Air Force. The project is now under the wing of the Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office.

"After a tumultuous history of sponsorship, it's great to see the X-37 finally get to the launch pad and get into space," said Gary Payton, U.S. Air Force Deputy Under Secretary for Space Programs in a media press briefing today.


http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/x-37b-robot-space-plane-launch-100420.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. it's to find the Amazon women on the moon
I KNEW they EXISTED!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. They look like sharks. Beam weapons from space?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penance Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. No, it looks like a sea bass
And I see no frikkin laser beam on its head. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. If I had to guess, I'd say anti-satellite application.
If the day comes that we go to a hot war with another nation, this guy will be knocking out the enemy's communication and imagery satellites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proletariatprincess Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. what ever it turns out to be, I feel confident that the USA is up to no good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Socal31 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
29. Obama is going to fly it into your bedroom!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GameChanger Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Possibly for the next target in the mideast?
Like Iran????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentauros Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
32. I sincerely hope it's not for that purpose,
due to the very real problem of collisional cascading. Once that happens, we can forget getting into orbit with anything, manned or otherwise, for a very long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
37. Capture, not blast...
If you blast an enemy satellite, you make your own space-based operations impossible....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Has anyone seen Palin & Bachmann since the craft went up? One can hope :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. I should ask my old client Dave Urie what he knows about this......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well, if you know of a better way...
...to spread chemtrails call 1-800-Bilderberger! They pay amazingly well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnakeEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. My guess is laser testing will be one thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. Created to maintain the ability to insert military satellites into orbit?
Edited on Thu Apr-22-10 11:40 PM by MilesColtrane
No problems sending up weather and telecom sats on foreign launch platforms, but the Pentagon isn't going to want to hand a top secret reconnaissance satellite or star wars component over to the Kremlin or ESA and hope they don't peek at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. Not big enough
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 12:24 AM by psychopomp


Its cargo bay is too small to fit most satellites. They can just put a satellite on top of the Atlas V booster anyway, they don't need the X-37B for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #26
41. It's cheaper to test on smaller models.
I'm willing to bet we will be seeing larger versions of this thing in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #20
44. that's why we have the Atlas V, Delta IV etc
You don't put a satellite in a vehicle like this and then put it on another launch vehicle. And no our military has a lot of launch options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dumak Donating Member (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
22. Perhaps part of the Prompt Global Strike program
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 12:11 AM by Dumak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
24. Daily Mail too tabloid for you? Here's some real news sources
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
27. K & R for the mystery. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Socal31 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
28. We get to see a small glimpse of what the Black Budget pays for at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
33. it's Iron Man!
and my 1000th post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
34. Dammit! Isn't it our tax dollars? For those bucks, the people deserve at least a generalization.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #34
42. Here is the generalization:
The Secretary of the Air Force states the OTV program will focus on "risk reduction, experimentation, and operational concept development for reusable space vehicle technologies, in support of long term developmental space objectives."

OTV is Orbital Test Vehicle which is Air Force name for the X-37B project.

My SWAG is that OTV is just that a test platform so Air Force can experiment with reduced scale designs at lower cost.
The one thing I do know is this isn't for launching spy sats. You don't need a reusable orbiter to launch sats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. well it could be for spy sat
It may be more manueverable than our normal spy sats. It may be planned as a spy sat on demand. You put it up for 5-9 months blow all the fuel moving around in orbit, bring it down and then refuel it. Now it's mostly dead weight so there only so much "working" material you can put up. But I imagine someone knows exactly what they can and can't get into the thing and if it's worth the limit capability. It could be used to augment current satellites in a very limit capacity role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
35. I understand it's for bombing oil rigs and shooting wolves from space.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
36. Capture and return satellites? Possibly "enemy" satellites?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
39. Americans are usually the last to know when it comes to its
military industrial complex activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
40. It's probably not very hard to figure out what the purpose is.
The X-37B carries a payload...and that payload certainly isn't a satellite. The military has been increasingly relying on drones....the X-37B is unmanned.

This idea is 60 years old:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silbervogel

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #40
47. Actually, the X37 probably serves multiple purposes.
NASA originally developed it as a reconfigurable space testing platform. The advantage of this type of arrangement is that it can be reconfigured to do just about anything. A cloak of secrecy was dropped over it when the project was transferred to DARPA, but there are two leading theories that have been discussed for years.

1. A quick launch spy satellite platform. Since the retirement of the Blackbird, it's been pointed out many times that spy sats have serious drawbacks. They can only view things beneath their orbits, and it can take days to move them from one orbit to another. This is a huge problem when you need quick images of a previously unmonitored area. Mounting one this way would permit the military to launch new spy sats whenever they want, into any orbit they need, and recall it when its done.

2. Think "global drone" that can sit in orbit and wait for orders. Potentially for weeks or years.

Of course, the second option would grossly violate the Space Treaty of 1967.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
46. Big fucking secret!!!! Here is the link to the Wikipedia article on the X-37B.
It has been around for several years, is being used as a test bed for military spacecraft. It is made by Boeing, and there also was an X-40, which was retired.
Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-37

There are many more references to it on Google if anyone would want to look.
The basic technology has been around since the 1990's.
This is just improving on that design.

m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC