Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ANOTHER SPYCAM UPDATE (Good stuff):

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 02:44 PM
Original message
ANOTHER SPYCAM UPDATE (Good stuff):
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 02:59 PM by PCIntern

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20100423_Judge_to_rule_in_Lower_Merion_Web-cam_case.html




Administrator agrees to surrender computer in Web cam case
By John P. Martin

INQURER STAFF WRITER

The Lower Merion School District administrator who had the ability to activate the Web cams on students' laptops agreed Friday to let investigators inspect her personal computer to see if she used the remote tracking program at home, according to an attorney in the case.

The administrator, information systems coordinator Carol Cafiero, has also agreed to sit for a second deposition, attorney Mark Haltzman said. Cafiero had previously refused to answer lawyers' questions about her role in the now-infamous tracking program.

Haltzman declined to discuss the specifics of the agreement or say when Cafiero would surrender her computer or to whom. Cafiero's attorney, Charles Mandracchia, did not immediately respond to calls and e-mails seeking comment.

But the agreement, reached after a teleconference Friday with a federal judge, clears one roadblock in resolving the dispute between the school district and Haltzman's client, Blake Robbins, the Harriton High School sophomore who contends in a lawsuit that the district used the Web cams on school-issued computers to spy on students and violated his civil rights.

**************************************************

More at the link

*************************************************

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now she's gonna see how it feels to have your privacy invaded...
I bet she has some neat stuff on that Hard Drive that we'll never see, but the authorities will...and they're entitled to, unlike her intrusiveness.

"I love it".

HA...Karma's a bitch, ain't it lady...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Classic example of "what goes around comes around". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
habitual Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. am i crazy here or is it just ridiculous that she's going
to hand over her puter after this long and anyone expects to find something incriminating on it???

She's a computer administrator, she will know how to get rid of the evidence.

All of the sudden she's so willing to cooperate? Yah, she finally made sure that any evidence that they could retrieve is long gone...

Please...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. If she scrubbed it
a good team of IT forensics experts will be able to tell.A recent scrubbing could set her up for obstruction of justice/destruction of evidence type charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Urban myth. A knowledgeable admin can hide stuff easily enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gvstn Donating Member (485 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I think a simple answer such as
"My computer was running slow I reinstalled the OS" could be both truthful and a means of destroying evidence. Unless, there was an order not to use the machine until a ruling was made on whether or not she had to surrender it I don't think they can hit her with any charge. It may sound fishy but it is not illegal.

The school's computer should have logs of anyone accessing the system from the net. Maybe some connections that don't fit a regular pattern would be useful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Destruction of evidence when you should have reasonably known it was going to be
subpoenaed can really hurt you in civil court. Several people tried that to their detriment with RIAA suits. Much would depend on the dates. It is much easier not to keep such records or auto wipe them so accusations of sanitizing can not get any legal traction. It is quite possible to scrub data and leave little to no trace, but it requires a level of skill beyond that found in many school IT departments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. What makes you think that there is anything there but fluff?
A competent admin can not only get rid of stuff so it can't be found but can cover their tracks so there is no clue stuff was removed. Easy enough to do with a certain level knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. She probably scrubbed it or replaced the hard drive.
I'm afraid the time lag has been too long to let her get away with all sorts of stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Agreed"??? It wasn't immediately confiscated as evidence?
(facepalm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That is not normally an option in civil litigation. No criminal charges have yet been filed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC