Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mother Jones: Internal Docs Prove Goldman's Ex-Mortgage Guru Lied Under Oath

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:44 AM
Original message
Mother Jones: Internal Docs Prove Goldman's Ex-Mortgage Guru Lied Under Oath
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 09:45 AM by kpete
Did Goldman's Ex-Mortgage Guru Lie Under Oath?

....................................

Daniel Sparks told Congress he didn't expect a group of financial products to fail. Internal documents suggest he knew otherwise.

— By Andy Kroll

Thu Apr. 29, 2010 3:00 AM PDT

...................

Internal documents show Sparks himself knew and often wrote about the firm's negative view of the mortgage markets and mortgage-related products:

* Sparks was among the recipients of an October 30, 2006, email concerning a $2 billion deal called Hudson Mezzanine 2006-1. One of the four products cited during the hearing, this synthetic CDO was downgraded to junk status less than 18 months later. That email shows that Goldman bought all $2 billion worth of protection against Hudson’s failure—meaning that even as the firm helped design the deal for sale to investors, it was betting on and stood to gain from Hudson's demise, which ultimately happened.

* In an email dated February 8, 2007, Sparks wrote: "Subprime environment—bad and getting worse. Everyday is a major fight for some aspect of the business (think whack-a-mole)."

* In a February 21, 2007, email, he wrote: "Bad news everywhere. Novastar (another subprime originator) bad earnings and 1/3 of market cap gone immediately. Wells (Fargo) laying off 300+ subprime staff and home price appreciation data showed for first time lower prices on homes over year broad based."

* In a March 1, 2007, email, Sparks noted that the subprime market was in "disarray" and it had become "clear that many people should not have been given loans." In a section of the email subtitled "Who is feeling the pain," he added, "CDOs"—that is, the product that Sen. Tester referred to during the hearing and that Sparks said he believed would perform.

* In a March 3, 2007, email containing notes from an earlier call, Sparks wrote: "Things we need to do…Focus on any exposures to originators," presumably to avoid losses, as many subprime players were flirting with collapse at the time. He went on to write, "For traders…Don't add risk…Get out of everything."

* According to the minutes of a March 7, 2007, meeting of Goldman's risk committee, Sparks delivered the following prognosis of the subprime mortgage market: "Game Over—accelerating meltdown for subprime lenders such as Fremont and New Century." He was so skeptical of the subprime industry that he told the risk committee, chaired by CFO Viniar, that the firm's mortgage operation "is currently closing down every subprime exposure possible." Meanwhile, Goldman wouldn't close its Abacus deal until the following month.

* In a March 7, 2007, email, Fabrice Tourre wrote, "According to Sparks, that business is totally dead, and the poor little subprime borrowers will not last so long!!!"

* In a March 10, 2007, email to a Goldman colleague, Sparks outlined a handful of positions against the mortgage markets that his own department had taken: "...getting short CDS (credit default swaps) on RMBS (residential mortgage-backed securities) and CDOs, getting short the super-senior BBB- and BBB index, and getting short AAA index as overall protection."


.............................

There's no doubt that Sparks knew the mortgage markets were in deep trouble, and that any CDOs linked to mortgage bonds were also imperiled. Given his firm's position and his own emails and internal Goldman communications, Sparks' testimony seems as dubious as the mortgage-backed securities his division sold to investors.

more:
http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/04/daniel-sparks-goldman-sachs-hearing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. VERY interesting. K & R. n/t
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 10:56 AM by chill_wind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe he just shouldn't have shown up.
What's the penalty for ignoring a congressional subpoena? What are they gonna do? Call the sargent at arms?

Pfffft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Quick! Get Reid and Pelosi on the phone!
This perjury needs to come "off the table" before anyone accidentally finds out about it.

And by "anybody," I don't mean those fucking retards on the left. They don't count anyway. What're they gonna do? Vote for a Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. ...
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. OK Now The Committee Has Someone With An Incentive To Tell All He Knows....
It's amazing how the memory can clear up when you are presented with proof of your perjured testimony.

I bet he knows a lot he failed to disclose so far....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. If anyone ever deserved to be sent to Gitmo, it's this POS economic terrorist.
Sickening. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. It'd be interesting to contrast those with some of the sales calls...
made in the same timeframe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oops!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC