On the Labor Front:

Been gone for awhile from reading/posting as well as keeping current with the news. Been busy (with my union) helping on some labor issues. I just wanted to post news on one of the labor issues we're working on.

Note: This post is a response to a comment in a different thread.

(Rules applied back and all. I posted a baseball reference recently.)

I don't think people should make a sport out of how they can make things better or worse.

And as far as some propaganda being a 'show'

It is not a show either. I can prove that.

If it was a show, then the other characters would be AI or not exist, and you would be only person, that argument creates despair, so pushing that argument has a secondary objective. It also creates lack of empathy so it creates another bad effect. Follow the money. If something that can not be proven is believed, look at the effects, they can show an indication of the purpose. Hence why we are taught to look at the fruits.

If it was a show and many people did exist, but some were picked to be harassed, then what would be the intent? To get them to do something for people to watch, but if that was the case, there would be no need for free will, and the script would be perfect, and there are many parts of life that do not add up to any perfect drama, comedy or anything else. Plus there would be no free will, which would create despair, which is same as last paragraph.

So show doctrine, is just so people go to despair, its real purpose. And with that real purpose you can see what side it is from.

Then there is the idea that it is a game being played, where people bet what they can get to happen. But if that was true, then there would be no stability anywhere, because it would be real easy to always find some person to do anything. So why are some not effected? or some have better effects? Those that have an effect on social policy or influence many people have more effects around them. Why is that? I agree there are attempts to move things directions, but the purpose of a show loses the dignity for people that I see in so many events.

For instance why am I allowed to have these thoughts that prove to me it is not a game or show. If it was either, why would I be allowed to be free from that? Because it is not either of them, and I have free will, and any manipulations around me do not change how I choose to view existence.

Just as an example, some linkage I see, but there is some I do not, so I know there is voices, but I also have free will in what I want to post and when. So there are other forces in existence, and it is up to each person to find what kind of forces they think are best, if they encounter them. Or to choose even to ignore them if they want.



And here is the other things, the stuff I posted has always been there, so it was having an effect already, I am just trying to show some people so that they can think on it and make a choice. People have been being influenced by things like that for years*, and they even tried to do it on purpose to gain more consolidation. So if now that same culture effects them, that is just rules applied back.


I would guess the reason some monks took a vow of silence, is when they tried to do good, what was around them, or what they said matched things or ended up being not nice to people. Just like when someone says something, sometimes the bad side tries to respond by making the person sorry for what they said. But what the person said is not the cause, it is some supernatural thing trying to get the person to stop doing good, by making him think he is causing it. However the good side can do the same thing, although it takes overcoming the bad side of it.

But anyway... you would have to be watching closely to understand this post.