Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Explanation for what caused the rig to blow.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:48 AM
Original message
Explanation for what caused the rig to blow.
April 30 (Bloomberg) -- A 2-foot-long metal clamp that failed to cut a pipe on the ocean floor may have cost 11 workers aboard the Deepwater Horizon oil rig their lives and cast a sprawling sheet of crude toward fisheries, wildlife sanctuaries and beaches.

All subsea oil wells are equipped with steel blades known as shear rams that are supposed to slash through the pipe at the top of the well during dangerous pressure surges when all other safety devices fail, said Ron Bohuslavicky, the senior well- control instructor at Well Control School in Houston.

The U.S. Coast Guard and BP Plc, which was using a Transocean Ltd. rig to drill the well that erupted on April 20, have been struggling to contain a gusher of crude that has been spewing from the seafloor for more than a week.
A 2002 study commissioned by the U.S. Minerals Management Service, the agency that oversees the offshore oil industry, found that 50 percent of the shear rams tested failed to cut through pipe and halt the flow of oil.
“It’s a bad situation,” said Bohuslavicky, who teaches employees from companies including BP and Transocean how to control blowouts. “The shear ram is the last resort when something like this happens, and if it had done its job then they probably wouldn’t have lost all those people and the rig.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601072&sid=aKqG43JpQb2w
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. A 50% failure rate in testing?..
That's brutal. Especially for your last (only?) line of defense against a blowout.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. "Crap-shoot" is the new "Fail-safe"
You rock corporate America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Come on, don't like like to gamble with your life? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. More speculation and finger pointing.
This is like saying peoples houses wouldn't burn down if they had fire extinguishers.

The finger pointing and blaming is going to be epic with this spill. With sooooo many many hands in the mix the lawsuits are going to be many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. the dicks company halliburton is in the middle of this too
So anything can and will happen before this is all said and done. The dick takes no prisoner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. We will get to see them eat their own. It is going to be brutal.
Grab your popcorn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. conservatives are spreading
the rumor the rig was blown up/sabotaged by "Greenpeace" or some "Liberals" to end drilling. ( I say BULLSHIT) like why would ANYONE risk a disaster like this for political gain? NO ONE is that politically crazed. THAT'S Bullshit... "for Company Profit" is the ONLY cause.

also I read the clamp you describe... or "Fail safe" emergency shut off safety valve was not used because it was not required by law.
Additionally the emergency valve required by other countries costs $500,000 just to install.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evasporque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Former coal mine managers worked there?....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Water pressure at 5000 feet is around 2165 PSI -- over a ton per square inch
Fairly difficult to work at those pressures.

If equipment is not already built and tested at those depths, it is not easy to improvise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ohferchrissakes-- more speculation. The rig had a blowout preventer valve with...
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 11:16 AM by TreasonousBastard
four, count 'em FOUR, safety valves on it, designed to trip when the pressure got to a dangerous level. That's one valve and three backups, not known for failure. It's at the wellhead and if it worked, it would have stopped the gusher. The robot gadgets down there are trying to trip it, but the pressures and mess around the hole are adding to the unknowns.

I found a study back in 2002 that showed shear rams had a failure rate of 50%, and that might still be true. Nobody does much testing of stuff in mile deep water.

on edit...

I guess I found the same study referenced in the article.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC