Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

polanski article. not "quite" accurate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 05:54 AM
Original message
polanski article. not "quite" accurate
GENEVA (AP) - Swiss justice officials said Friday they are not interested in an attempt by Roman Polanski's U.S. lawyers to unseal secret testimony by his original prosecutor in Los Angeles and submit that in the director's fight against extradition to the United States.

Switzerland works on the assumption that the extradition request from the U.S. is based on correct statements and the secret testimony wouldn't change that, Justice Ministry spokesman Folco Galli said.

Polanski's lawyers, in a motion filed Thursday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, said transcripts of testimony by retired Deputy District Attorney Roger Gunson would prove that the extradition request is based on false and incomplete statements by the Los Angeles district attorney's office.

The lawyers claimed they need the testimony to submit it to Swiss authorities who are trying to decide whether to extradite Polanski to Los Angeles for having sex in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl.

-----

actually no. he was originally charged with rape by use of drugs, perversion, sodomy, lewd and lascivious act upon a child under fourteen, and furnishing a controlled substance to a minor.

he accepted a plea deal of engaging in unlawful intercourse with a minor (statutory rape), largely because the 13 yr old victim wanted to remain anonymous and stay out of court...

however, since he fled prior to sentencing, ALL of the charges remain pending, not merely 'having sex with a 13 yr old girl' but the charges of rape by use of drugs, etc.

calling that 'having sex' is a bit disingenuous. drugging and raping a girl against her will is not merely "having sex " with her.

so, he is not being extradited for "having sex" with a 13 yr old girl
just for the record
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh and BTW: His last movie sucked.
Dude needs to pay for his crime...Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes he does
(even if his last movie was good).

He's a scumbag who has tried to evade justice for the majority of his adult life. Boo freaking hoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. I see the media doing that all the time, and yes, it pisses me off
Why so many try to defend that piece of shit is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. interesting. i hadnt thought of that. but he made a deal and knocked down to one charge.
because he ran that means the deal is no longer and he faces 6 charges?

interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC