Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Massive oil spill was foreseeable. 117 blowout preventer failures in a two year period.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 10:37 PM
Original message
Massive oil spill was foreseeable. 117 blowout preventer failures in a two year period.
Edited on Mon May-03-10 10:43 PM by Karmadillo
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/may2010/oilr-m03.shtml

<edit>

Oil is now flowing into the Gulf at a rate of as high as 25,000 barrels a day due to the explosion and the subsequent failure of a blowout preventer (BOP), which is designed to plug the well in the event of an emergency. The BOP is still not responding to attempts to close it.

Neither the company nor the government had in place any backup plans in the event of a failure of the BOP. Options currently being considered to plug the well will take weeks or months to implement and may not be successful.

“We’re breaking new ground here,” said Coast Guard Commandant Thad Allen. “It’s hard to write a plan for a catastrophic event that has no precedent, which is what this was.”

But was a failure of the BOP really unforeseeable?

A 1999 report from the government’s Minerals Management Service (MMS), leaked by Democratic Senator Maria Cantwell of Washington, found that there were 117 BOP failures in a two-year period in the late 1990s.

While none of these failures resulted in a spill at the magnitude of the Deepwater Horizon, they clearly demonstrate the fallibility of BOPs. One crucial difference is that the other BOP failures occurred in shallower waters.

more...

ON EDIT: Fixed typo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. If the new relief well blows also, what the hell is plan B?
If the relief well fails, won't it just increase the amount of oil leakage?

If the second well is designed like the first one that failed, why do the geniuses in charge believe it won't fail as well?

Why am I not optimistic?

Why do I have the feeling that they are just trying any hare-brained scheme to get the public to believe that they know what they are doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Can't they set off some kind of charge to collapse the hole??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Probably not a good idea.
Supposedly the rig collapsed/exploded because the pressure pushing the oil up was greater than what they anticipated.

Setting off a charge might just enlarge the hole if it failed to plug it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wonder what the fail rate is? It would seem quite high if there were 117 failures in just 2 years..
You would think that would throw massive red flags to management and regulators to require improvements to the BOP design.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Most executives combine the greed and arrogance of Cheney with the intelligence of G.W. Bush. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojeoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. This was like a giant undersea pimple that should have been left alone!!
Leave it alone! You'll get a scar!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kick
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC