Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Supreme Court Shuts Front Doors to Visitors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 08:46 AM
Original message
U.S. Supreme Court Shuts Front Doors to Visitors
U.S. Supreme Court Shuts Front Doors to Visitors
By:Lawrence Hurley




In a triumph for security concerns over architectural symbolism, the U.S. Supreme Court has announced that visitors can no longer climb the famous marble steps and enter the building via its iconic front entrance. Ever since the Washington, D.C., building, designed by Cass Gilbert, was completed in 1935, the public has been able to pass under the famous words "Equal Justice Under Law," which are engraved above the court's double bronze doors. Now, visitors are required to use side entrances at each side of the steps.

Announced without warning on May 3 and put into effect a day later, the decision, which the Supreme Court said was based on two independent security studies, has prompted considerable criticism, not least from within the court. Justice Stephen Breyer, known for his interest in architecture, took the unusual step of issuing a memorandum explaining his opposition to the change. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg signed on in support. "To many members of the public, this court's main entrance and front steps are not only a means to, but also a metaphor for, access to the court itself," Breyer wrote.

Cynthia Nikitin, vice president of the New York-based Project for Public Spaces, which has worked with the federal government to make buildings more accessible, denounced the decision in even stronger terms. The court has "slammed the door literally and figuratively on what should be a well-thought-out process," she said.

http://www.architectmagazine.com/security/supreme-court-shuts-front-doors-to-visitors.aspx

They they their pro-corporate stance is not popular with the people. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. "We the people" now have to use the servant's entrance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Symbolic......considering what their rulings have done to democracy.
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. This phrase is highly deceptive
"the decision, which the Supreme Court said" They must surely mean the GSA or whoever manages the property, I seriously doubt the justices made this decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. Can't be too careful...
....someone might spill oil in the hall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Equal Justice Under Law" if you represent corporate interest the rest of us...not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. the neo con justices are afraid and they should be


that's why the front doors are shut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC