Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

10 years from now "RTTT will be widely recognized as a colossal waste of federal money"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:39 AM
Original message
10 years from now "RTTT will be widely recognized as a colossal waste of federal money"
Those are the words recently of Diane Ravitch, former assistant Secretary of Education under GHW Bush.

She expresses much concern that Congress was not consulted on this use of federal money.

From the Bridging Differences blog at Education Week:

The Reason for the Phony Consensus About School 'Reform'

When I spoke at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C., on March 11, I asked my audience of Washington insiders the very question that Russ Whitehurst now raises: How is it possible that the Obama administration can spend $5 billion without congressional hearings and congressional authorization?

No one answered my question. When I worked in the U.S. Department of Education in 1991-1993, my agency (the Office of Educational Research and Improvement) had the department's largest pot of discretionary dollars, and it was only about $10 million. Congress was extremely vigilant in insisting that every dollar appropriated could be spent only for authorized programs.

In the case of Race to the Top, the administration determined its priorities without consulting Congress. It now has $5 billion to dangle in front of the states to persuade them to change their laws and their policies. Russ Whitehurst is disturbed by RTTT even though he agrees with the policies it promotes. Like Russ, I am disturbed that the administration has done an end run around Congress, but I am also concerned that RTTT is warping state decision-making, and I dislike the policies it promotes. I believe that 10 years from now RTTT will be widely recognized as a colossal waste of federal money that eroded state control of education and compelled cash-hungry states to embark on programs that did not improve education. We may never be able to undo the damage to children, schools, teachers, public education, and federalism now being done in the name of "reform."


These two paragraphs of hers echo the feelings of many teachers like myself who are feeling betrayed and rather hopeless about the future of public education.

Today, Race to the Top is based on choice and accountability with nary a nod to equity (the nature of a "race to the top" implies that a few will win, and most will lose the race). No wonder Education Secretary Arne Duncan was able to barnstorm the country in tandem with former Speaker Newt Gingrich; no wonder the former chairman of the Republican National Committee wrote a laudatory article about the Obama education agenda in The Washington Post: Lots more choice and accountability! Looks just like the Republican agenda.

So, what happened to the Democratic agenda? Lost, stolen, strayed, forgotten, misplaced?
I don't need to ask about the Republicans' loss of memory about federalism; even Republican governors have their hands eagerly outstretched in hopes of getting federal dollars in a time of economic crisis.

Diane


Here is one of the important quotes from Russ Whitehurst in the article Ravitch quoted in the blog above.

He is expressing concern that Congress had no say in the Race to the Top funds and plans.

It used to be that Bill Gates was the most powerful education philanthropist in America. Thanks to the Race to the Top, that mantle has passed to Arne Duncan. Do we want to make that the permanent status of U.S. secretaries of education?

The legislative process is messy, but we are better served in the long term by allowing our elected representatives to decide on the education policies we are to pursue as a nation, rather than having them dictated to us by the executive branch under the guise of a grant program to reward reform and innovation.

Did Congress Authorize Race to the Top?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rec nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Thanks.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. I am a little ticked off they took the name race to the top for that.
It is possible race to the top, was thought of without correlation, but I was talking about the concepts of race to the top and race to the bottom for years, and have not read it anywhere else before then.


Although it could be an idea someone else has, if they think private ownership for profit motive is race to the top, it would be tough to not be pissed at that.


I am still thinking they might get it right, although I saw a full Internet high school add on tv, and that will really hamper social growth of people, which is how people need to develop, so that is an example of what they are good at not even letting them realize that other component of that issue are needed.

There is no substitute for actual interaction in class. But anyway, they have to mess up first anyway, and they might get it right. The bad part is when a small group messes up that does not have representative power, they make many pay for there mistakes. Not good.

I am a bit concerned about the articles posted on that topic also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. "if they think private ownership for profit motive is race to the top"
Yes they think that....it is their goal. Not a good idea, and too late to fix it once it takes place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Just because we are Progressives
doesn't mean that we cannot look back. Unfortunately, this administration of deceit has used this as their mantra. We can't look back at all of the illegal activities perpetuated by our government and elected officials. We can't put the most important things "on the table." It sure sounds like the same shit we heard from the village idiot for 8 years. We can't look back at the constitution and see that a "unitary executive" was never intended. Amazing how being a "wartime president" can give you literally unlimited power and SECRECY.
Yet, here we are. A proper mandate for a free public education guaranteed to all, yet that word "free" bothers the hell out of even our Democratic president?
Just reading the "American Institute and Newt Gingrich" mentioned as leaders in our countrys' education is horrifying. Obviously Arne Duncan fits right in with these "profit at all cost" mercenaries. Obviously if there is a "race", then by definition there will be winners and losers. I fear that our children will continue to be the losers and the "for profit charter schools will be the major winners. It won't be long until "chain schools", like McDonald's will be the norm. just like our "privatized prisons" have become owned by a continually dwindling amount of companies. Some may argue that there are already monopolies in this privatized prison endeavor and they would be right.
Besides inferior services, what do these privatized institutions give us? Smaller salaries so the profit margin can be maximized. Of course, as in our prisons, this inevitably leads to overcrowding and reduced attention given to our children, just like the absurd ratio of minimum wage prison guards per inmate. These grossly underpaid guards, who continually fear for their life and safety in the prisons are much more susceptible to bribes (good old capitalism) or threats to allow the inmates to get contraband and basically run the prison. How long will it be before (already happening I'm sure) wealthy parents bribe grossly underpaid teachers so their children can get good grades and be accepted at the best colleges. Look at Bush...Yale material?
Now, lets break the new rules and look back. In the 1950's and the 1970's (random choices) before government sponsored Charter Schools (and privatized prisons too), America's free educational system was considered world class. Our Unionized teachers earned a meager, but "collectively bargained for", salary. Our students were generally well informed and motivated by an under-appreciated group of passionately purposeful educators, who were secure in their jobs and although underpaid, they were given respect in their neighborhoods (and at work) and they were secure in the knowledge that they had chosen to educate children, not for great profit but as a calling. Yes, even though they were underpaid, they were secure in their jobs and collectively bargained as a unit for a lower middle class wage, but they were doing what they loved; molding young minds. There were societal rules which enabled them to do this in a much less hostile atmosphere. The FAIRNESS DOCTRINE for the media, ensured that their pupils were exposed to differing world views and honest information.

Looking back again, this was before the government required that you had to have an "education degree" to become a teacher. Teachers were basically people who were fascinated by their individual subjects and therefore would major in English or Mathematics out of their love of that subject. It is much easier to teach a subject that you are passionate about, rather than having a degree in education, which guarantees you the possibility to teach but not necessarily a subject that you love. You need to know how to position the window blinds to minimize distractions and someone Else's theories about the best way to ensure your students are learning. things that you previously learned what worked best for you, by experience and reasoning skills. Hey, why not a standardized test? The land of the free, teaching to a standardized test that threatens educators with job loss if their students haven't performed uniformly.
No more teachers who are hired for their particular expertise in an individual subject. Now we have teachers who want to teach but cannot concentrate on their field of expertise, too much paperwork and don't forget that standardized test or you'll be fired.
In the meantime, free market capitalism marches on. No more FAIRNESS DOCTRINE which exposed students to the indispensable tool of reasoning. Yes, they were no longer allowed to hear differing viewpoints and use their reasoning skills to deduce the truth. Now, the law states that "news outlets" are not required to be honest or allow people to share their viewpoints.
Now, Schools must turn out automatons, not individuals with the capacity to reason. Of course, since reagans misguided (at best) belief that only profits are important, these still motivated and now indoctrinated teachers are required to produce these automatons and compete for lower wages and benefits. Forget the unity of collective bargaining and its innate fairness.
Reagan not only totally fucked up Americas moral compass. He legislated profits before people. He and his predecessors, whose corporate ownership guaranteed their unquestioning capitalistic "morals", have just come to the obvious next step. Privatize the schools. Profits are to be made. Who wants a citizen who can reason and realize that people should come before profits? They are dangerous. No more collective bargaining. Now it's who you know (or screw) not what you know.
Teachers, they have brought along slowly to the point of their demise. They did it to the proletariat factory worker much quicker. Next? Maybe the pharmacists or another vocation that they feel they can profit off of while "giving" you a smaller piece of the pie. Profits baby, Indian pharmacists are much cheaper....
These are the same types of legislation that have led to the demise of most failed states, with the wealthiest 5% of our nation owning over 90% of the nations wealth, we are far along the path of failure and unless we look behind us, at history, we are bound for the same inevitable demise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. "For many decades, the Democratic national agenda was equity"
"The real reason for the consensus is that the Obama administration has embraced the agenda of the George W. Bush administration. For many decades, the Democratic national agenda was equity: programs intended to equalize funding for the districts and schools serving the poorest students. Since the election of Ronald Reagan, the Republican agenda was choice and accountability (and Republicans were always opposed to federal interference in state and local decision-making).

Today, Race to the Top is based on choice and accountability with nary a nod to equity (the nature of a "race to the top" implies that a few will win, and most will lose the race)."

http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/Bridging-Differences/

Education should be a real life experience, not a contest or survival of the fittest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n.michigan Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. On RAT RACE TT BOTTOM-Note to Duncan- a book by Carl Rogers- "On Becoming A Person"
Mr Duncan appears gray, slightly rat-like, vacuous, ignorant, and he exhibits and promotes the basest, lowest values and immoral concepts in American society. His perversion of educational goals for a successful society is notable and one wonders what sort of person he really is. And he is in such a hurry that you wonder what his own race is about.

Money bribes, fearful and compulsive time limits, punishing accountability and testing of those "down the line" of authority, money for compliance, ignorance of professional advice from educators who have experience and the educational psychologists who really do understand motivation of the young. NOWHERE else does OBAMA solicit such accountability for standards. Not for the bankers, Wall Street, ect...where truly criminal minds have succeeded.

Note to Mr. Duncan- recommend therapy- real therapy and education. Your policies are RUTHLESS and BASE. Their sheer UGLINESS is not the spirit of America.

A RAT RACE- to the TOP simply implies GET IN LINE. THERE ARE PRIZES If you are lucky, come from a good family, have resources, aren't held back by disability, or ill health- you might get to the top. Others may land at the bottom- those in our society less fortunate. Model egalitarianism (democratic ideals) are lacking in Duncan's program for America and most likely his character and that of his leader. Opposition to the race is assured Mr. Duncan. Americans are not fools. We don't like the America you are trying to create. It is all deficit and no surplus of fairness, understanding, knowledge, and the shared PUBLIC values of a cooperative, common humanity. Make no mistake, it is the COOPERATIVE, CHRISTLIKE that is missing in this militant, industrial competitive model for America's children. Harsh. Base. Rat-like society.

We all must of necessity be opposed to your methods and schemes for children in our society. The failure of PUBLIC, the citizen pride in our country is treasonous. And as can be seen elsewhere with policy decisions, it is clear that Mr. Duncan and Obama are opposed to a more equitable, kinder model for our future.


*Mad- I posted this with you a couple days ago, but it really fits today. I hope you don't mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes, thanks, I read that post. Sounds like a book that needs reading.
Not that familiar with Rogers, but looking up more about him.

I agree with your statement about Duncan, whom I very much distrust.

"His perversion of educational goals for a successful society is notable and one wonders what sort of person he really is."

Yes, his goals for education are most perverted and disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Did Congress authorize the RTTT?
Good question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. I propose that we rename it "Race To The Bank" since that's what it seems to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Banks are making huge profits under the New Market Tax Credit...
http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2010/05/new-market-tax-credits-or-how-to-shake.html

And it ends up with the charter school and public paying the bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R Starting to feel ashamed for helping the adm. get elected.
HCR was a farce, but could be fixed in a decade or so.

Continuing the war will still kill thousands for no reason, but it will end.

So many of the half steps can be fixed later. But this will permanently end our country's education heritage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. separate and unequal
obama /duncan vision of the future.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. I Don't Think There Is Any Future For Public Education
and I think that's not only sad, but a real big policy mistake.

I don't know what it will take to turn the trend around. Social cohesiveness and consensus? What are the odds of that coalescing out of the ferment of this era any time soon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think of it more as a coming out party for the "Kill the Teachers Unions" movement.
Until know they operated largely in the shadows now it is front and center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. It's a worldwide trend, by the way, pushed by the likes of the World Bank
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. any chance we can get our hands on their true agenda?
somehow we need to start bank and save capital so we can take
care of ourselves and leave the risk taking aristotelians to
themselves. 

Let us offer $14% interest on savings and 5% interest on loans
that make new businesses that will save and spend at the same
time. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC