Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On the SCOTUS "too many Catholics and Jews" meme

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DaveinJapan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 03:42 AM
Original message
On the SCOTUS "too many Catholics and Jews" meme
I've been reading that here a lot lately, and it strikes me as odd.

First of all, since when is two "too many"?

As far as the Catholic contingent is concerned, I suppose a lot of people are thinking that because the Catholic church is staunchly anti-choice that means having "too many" Catholics on the bench could put Roe v Wade in danger or something. But would replacing a few of them with a few fundamentalist Protestants really make any difference?

And if we were to start all over with a Baptist, a Mormon, a Catholic, a Presbyterian, a Jehovah's Witness, a Lutheran and a Jew, who would be screaming "there are too many Christians! need diversity!"? Very few, I would imagine.

Given the fact that a religious affiliation of one sort or another is an implicit requirement for consideration, frankly it makes no difference to me which flavor of believer they happen to be. Certainly far less important than their leanings either liberal or conservative is concerned anyway.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's unfortunate that religious affiliation is an implicit requirement for
consideration. Justice would likely be better served if religious affiliation was a disqualification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinJapan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree that it's unfortunate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm Jewish and I feel diversity is important. The President should nominate a Muslim or Hindu person
Edited on Thu May-06-10 07:07 AM by mucifer
I'm not kidding. Why not? Many of us supported Judge Sotomayor. If we can get both diversity AND and decent judge why not? I also don't think the supreme court should be one third Jewish if we are only 8 percent of the population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. How about an Atheist or Agnostic... there are quite a few of us around!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gaedel Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think..
we really need to get into a four man, four woman, one LGBT court of which six must be Caucasian, one must be Hispanic, one African-American, and one Asian. Then we need to decide the appropriate mix of religions and non-religions among the nine.

"Mr President, your next selection is limited to an Asian woman who espouses a non-fundamentalist, mainstream Protestant religion. We have combed the database and there is a Justice of the Peace in northern Vermont who matches the requirements."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. No more religious nuts
If you believe in fantasy, you have no business on a court because you are warp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernyankeebelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. As a catholic, pro-choice I take offense to that. I can't stand Alito and am
italian-american. We all don't think the same. If you took a poll a majority of catholics are pro-choice. We don't march lock step with the vatican or the pope. Am a liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC