Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Rude Pundit: Our Guns Are Way More Important Than Your Disasters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 10:46 AM
Original message
The Rude Pundit: Our Guns Are Way More Important Than Your Disasters
While a good chunk of Nashville, which, in addition to being Music City, is also the capital of Tennessee, was underwater this week, the legislature kept at its job of making the Volunteer State safer for drunks. Yes, as residents of middle Tennessee were driving boats around the streets of their neighborhoods, wondering how much FEMA was gonna come through for the many homeowners without flood insurance, the state House passed a bill that had been previously passed by the Senate, both by veto-proof majorities, which allows people with carry permits to bring their guns into anywhere that lets you drink, and "That includes restaurants, nightclubs, honky-tonks, country clubs and any other place with an alcohol license, including places such as the Tennessee Aquarium in Chattanooga." Honky-tonks and aquariums? Yippee-ki-yay, motherfucker, indeed.

Down in Louisiana, as the slick diarrhea of oil crept its way towards the outer islands and began its long wreckage of the seafood industry there, the state House debated and voted on a number of gun measures. The vote was 96-1 to allow people with concealed carry permits to do so within 1000 feet of a school. School campuses remain gun-free, so far. But, with the proper permit, you can walk around the sidewalk outside a school with a gun in your pants. However, a vague modicum of sanity prevailed and the bill that would allow concealed weapons in churches got a majority, but not the necessary two-thirds needed to pass. Don't worry. You can still stalk around outside a church with your sidearm.

In Washington, D.C., senators who have no problem with the government spying on citizens without a warrant or holding people without charge for years, even torturing them for information, finally drew a line in the sand. They refused to budge on the idea that people on the government's terror watch list should be banned from buying guns, and they told this to Mike Bloomberg, mayor of the city that almost got car bombed. For Susan Collins, the Elmer Fudd of the Maine congressional delegation, it comes down to the possibility that someone could be on the list who's not a terrorist. Lindsey Graham, needing to appear butch after getting teabagged in his home state recently, said that it's just a slippery slope to banning handguns. In other words, you can stop someone from flying if they're on a list, but not from buying a gun.

Back in Tennessee, Joe McCord, a Republican from Maryville, which is as conservative district as you could imagine, went on a tear about what really is going on with the guns-in-bars law: "Essentially, the NRA is saying to us, if you don’t support and vote for carrying guns in bars, we will not endorse you and in fact will oppose you. This line of reasoning is just bordering on lunacy."

By the way, McCord has an "A" rating from the NRA. But, still, he said, "No one’s right all the time. The NRA is not right here, and we’re not standing up to them. It makes me wonder, what line will we not cross for the NRA? At what point do we say, this is too much?"

Oh, and, by the way again, before you start thinking that this is some portrait in courage, of a brave legislator standing up to the monolith that is the National Rifle Association, he's not running for re-election, which he admits has given him a bit of freedom: "I’m not running again. You can tell because I’m sitting here criticizing the NRA."

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I see the gun nuts are out unreccing already.
Anyone who thinks that passing some stupid gun law when their state is drowning is a good thing is unbelievably stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. to them, you don't dare question The Great God Gun, and its Mighty Presence
Edited on Fri May-07-10 10:51 AM by villager
around children, inebriates, students, or anywhere else such "Big Men" feel the need to "carry..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. paulsby will be along soon, chiding you about the "need canard" :eyes: n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Paulsby is too busy eating pizza
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Really? Paulsby was TS'd?
What happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I don't know what happened this time, but he'd been TS'd previously under a different name, I think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. There Is A God....... (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NBachers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Stand back there, pardner
Edited on Fri May-07-10 10:56 AM by NBachers
I'm a packin' and I'm a wackin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Next step: All Americans required to carry a handgun...
or rocket launcher on their person at all times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Caution


Isn't that the same kind of "logic" that has men screwing ducks as the 'inevitable result' of repealing DOMA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Oh really?
25 Years Later, "Gun Town USA" Continues to Maintains Exceptionally Low Crime Stats
Do you know that if you live in the small town of Kennesaw, Georgia, you are required to have and maintain a firearm?

On May 1, 1982, a new ordinance was passed by the city council of Kennesaw. This law ( Sec. 34-1 Heads of households to maintain firearms) made it mandatory for each household to own and maintain a gun, as well as
ammunition. Not only was the ordinance passed by city council, it was a unanimous decision. The ordinance states the gun law is needed "In order to provide for the emergency management of the City, and further in order to provide for and protect the safety, security and general welfare of the city and its inhabitants, every head of household residing in the City limits is required to maintain a firearm, together with ammunition therefore." Of course, exclusions were made to convicted felons, people with religious objections, and people with disabilities.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/738709/firearm_ownership_is_mandatory_for.html?cat=17
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. And it was never enforced. I've been to Kennesaw, have you? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. What difference does that make?
Where you have visited is totally irrelevant. But the gun requirement was put forth. My comment was not so far from reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. A law that was passed in 1982, never enforced, has no penalty for non-compliance, and..
.. only done as a political stunt in response to the village of Morton Grove, IL's gun ban.

Yeah, that's reeeeeeal close to forcing every resident to carry a handgun at all times.

:crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. does kind of make me wonder what their 'accident' rate is, however.
Ever see "Hot Fuzz"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Funny how folks weren't allowed to do this for decades and yet guns weren't banned
Somehow, carrying EVERYWHERE has become some sort of all out goal by these folks, and if you oppose this then you "are trying to take our guns away". Nutcases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I've said it before, and will probably again -
if the gun manufacturers suddenly, somehow, went bankrupt and shut down, and the only guns available were from foreign corporations, the NRA would dry up and blow away.

The NRA is nothing but a corporate front to promote the industry's product.

It may not have always been, but it fell into corporatist, fascist hands at least 40 years ago and has been all about RW politics and pushing the product ever since, and damn the consequences.

The ONLY right, the ONLY constitution protection they are interested in is the 2nd amendment - to hell with 'ensure domestic tranquility' and 'promote the general welfare'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. NRA members claim it is funded by your average gun owner...
Do you have info about funding from gun makers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. That lobbying group would be the NSSF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC