Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

World's worst environmental offenders

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 03:54 PM
Original message
World's worst environmental offenders
http://www.smartplanet.com/people/blog/pure-genius/study-us-ranks-among-the-worst-countries-for-environmental-impact/3600/
<snip>
“The environmental crises currently gripping the planet are the corollary of excessive human consumption of natural resources,” said Corey Bradshaw, the institute’s director of ecological modeling. “There is considerable and mounting evidence that elevated degradation and loss of habitats and species are compromising ecosystems that sustain the quality of life for billions of people worldwide.”

The ten countries with the worst environmental impact, according to the study, are:

1. Brazil
2. United States
3. China
4. Indonesia
5. Japan
6. Mexico
7. India
8. Russia
9. Australia
10. Peru

Most integral to a country’s environmental impact — more so than human population size and governance quality — was its gross national income, the study said. “Total wealth was the most important explanatory variable,” Bradshaw said. “The richer a country, the greater its average environmental impact.”

And although wealthier countries have better access to clean technology and more “green” awareness, the researchers found no evidence to support the theory that environmental degradation levels off or declines past a certain wealth threshold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess I expected to see a list of corporations, not countries.
Peru and Indonesia? Really? I'm going to guess it is because of deforestation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That would be more accurate, but this helps maintain the illusion and is not
without merit.
:kick: & R


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC