Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sestak Runs Much Stronger Against Toomey

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 05:49 PM
Original message
Sestak Runs Much Stronger Against Toomey
Don't trust Rasmussen, but this is interesting.

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/05/10/sestak_runs_much_stronger_against_toomey.html

Sestak Runs Much Stronger Against Toomey


A new Rasmussen survey in Pennsylvania shows Pat Toomey (R) beating Sen. Arlen Specter (D) in a Senate match up, 50% to 38%.

However, when Toomey is matched against Rep. Joe Sestak (D), he leads by just two points, 42% to 40%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
greencharlie Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. with Sestak, it'll be a good race in Nov... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yowza. Things are really heating up here in PA!
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberblonde Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's because Toomey isn't running any ads yet.
Prediction: Should Joe Sestak pull this off, he will be yet another Blue Dog senator. Just what we need! Everyone was so busy jumping down Specter's throat, they didn't notice Sestak's voting record was just as conservative as Specter's until he decided to run for Specter's seat as a "progressive."

This is the same guy we first elected as a netroots progressive - who promptly turned around and voted FOR the war and for FISA - the two issues he promised us he'd vote against.

Netroots amnesia filled his campaign coffers again. When will we learn? Charlie Brown, meet football.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sestak IS more liberal than Specter.
Edited on Tue May-11-10 07:48 PM by MH1
Project Vote-Smart is a non-partisan website that tracks voting records and interest group ratings. Interest group ratings are your best way to gauge a politician's positions because the organizations you know about, who care about the same things you do (or who you despise because they pursue the opposite policies) do the work for you.

So, go to project vote-smart and look up interest group ratings on both Sestak and Specter, and make an informed choice of which best represents YOUR interests. (and that's not you as in uberblonde but the generalized you, of course)

http://www.votesmart.org

One specific item I'll point out: in 2004, Specter advocated for a flat tax and elimination of the estate tax. http://www.votesmart.org/npat.php?can_id=53340#838 Since when are THOSE progressive positions? Specter also voted for DOMA.

If you care about the environment, also look up the detailed scorecard at lcv.org (League of Conservation Voters). Check Specter's lifetime score, not just the last year since Sestak challenged him in this primary.




edited to change confusing subject line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC