Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House not impressed with McChrystal's results in Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 02:35 AM
Original message
White House not impressed with McChrystal's results in Afghanistan
Source: Examiner (Charlotte)

The agreement between General Stanley McChrystal and the White house was that the General must provide quantifiable proof the U.S. war plan was working in Afghanistan by December, as well as show that the “overall transition to stability and vastly improved governance" has been completed by that time.

However, McChrystal’s plan isn’t achieving its proposed objectives thus far – and the Pentagon is not giving McChrystal much leeway. It appears every report and “unofficial” line emanating from the White House is negative about McChrystal’s execution, as if prepping the ground for a planned withdrawal in mid-2011.

White House and military brass are not delighted with U.S. accomplishments - or lack thereof - in the provinces of Marjah and Helmund and are questioning the unfolding strategy in Kandahar. Meanwhile, the American public is quickly losing confidence that the war in Afghanistan is worth the cost according to recent polls.

more: http://www.examiner.com/x-30980-Afghanistan-Headlines-Examiner~y2010m5d12-White-House-not-impressed-with-McChrystals-results-in-Afghanistan?cid=edition-by-channel-rss-National-News&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+examiner%2FzzII+%28News-+Dothan%29&utm_content=Twitter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. And I bet they weren't happy with the black site at Bagram finding
by the Red Cross, either, although they knew what they were buying up front.

I hope he's toast. He's really bad news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'd place my main disappointment about 6 levels higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Meanwhile, the American public is quickly losing confidence in the war.."
...you got to be friggin' kidding me?

This has to be the understatement of the century.


How about changing that statement to: "American people losing confidence in Mr. Obama for the surge which is killing women and children with Drone attacks."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. And I am unimpressed with a WH that thinks
fighting a hostile populace in a distant guerrilla incursion is 'winnable'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. McChrystal's sounds like a world wide chain of fast meth kitchens.
"Meet us at the Golden Triangle"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC