Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC - "For court clout, no judicial experience needed" - Judicial Exp. Req Only Applies To Women?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 12:47 PM
Original message
MSNBC - "For court clout, no judicial experience needed" - Judicial Exp. Req Only Applies To Women?
Edited on Wed May-12-10 12:49 PM by TomCADem
I was reading this article, and I noticed the bolded typo. No woman has served on the Supreme Court without any prior judicial experience. Only men. Thus, I wonder whether this requirement is only applicable to women?

If so, what is it about women that requires them to have judicial experience as a prerequisite to a seat on the Supreme Court while men can dispense with this requirement? Will the media be willing to ask Republicans this question? Why do 40 out 111 men get to serve on the Supreme Court without prior judicial experience, including Rehnquist, but women need to have judicial experience as a prerequiste. After all, no Republican is going to say publicly that they are just being partisan.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37072697/ns/politics-supreme_court/


John Marshall, William Rehnquist, Louis Brandeis, Earl Warren, William O. Douglas, Harlan Fiske Stone, Robert Jackson, Felix Frankfurter, Joseph Story and Roger Taney.

This roster of Supreme Court justices — rated by legal experts and historians as among the greatest or most influential jurists in the court’s history — had one thing in common with Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan: None had ever served as a judge prior to becoming a justice on the nation’s highest court.

Every member of the current court served as a federal appeals court judge immediately prior to being appointed to the high court. And Americans have gotten used to thinking this is normal or even mandatory. It isn't. Forty of the 111 men and women to serve on the high court since 1789 had no judicial experience. In fact, it isn’t even required that a justice possess a law degree.

* * *
Some Republican senators say Kagan’s lack of judicial experience is reason for concern. Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, called Kagan “a surprising choice because she lacks judicial experience. Most Americans believe that prior judicial experience is a necessary credential for a Supreme Court justice.”




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just goes to show republicans
don't know a damn thing about history, even when their own party is concerned. Someone should ask him. How about Rehnquist, (the dope addict) didn't have Judaical experience before he was appointed to the bench.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Isn't This Classic Discrimination? Affirmative Action For White Males?
Nearly 40 percent of Supreme Court justices (men) are not previously judges, but women are universally must meet this new requirement that they have prior judicial experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Take Opie Roberts for example.
He never saw the back side of a court bench until 2002. And that was Chimpy appointing him as a reward for his role in the Florida Fraud of 2000. He went from zero to Chief Justice in three years. At least Billy Rehnquist got 14 years on the bench before St. Reagan gave him the top job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC