Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mind Control Theories and Techniques used by Mass Media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 07:19 AM
Original message
Mind Control Theories and Techniques used by Mass Media

Mass media is the most powerful tool used by the ruling class to manipulate the masses. It shapes and molds opinions and attitudes and defines what is normal and acceptable. This article looks at the workings of mass media through the theories of its major thinkers, its power structure and the techniques it uses, in order to understand its true role in society.

Mass media are media forms designed to reach the largest audience possible. They include television, movies, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, records, video games and the internet. Many studies have been conducted in the past century to measure the effects of mass media on the population in order to discover the best techniques to influence it. From those studies emerged the science of Communications, which is used in marketing, public relations and politics. Mass communication is a necessary tool the insure the functionality of a large democracy; it is also a necessary tool for a dictatorship. It all depends on its usage.

In the 1958 preface for A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley paints a rather grim portrait of society. He believes it is controlled by an “impersonal force”, a ruling elite, which manipulates the population using various methods.

“Impersonal forces over which we have almost no control seem to be pushing us all in the direction of the Brave New Worldian nightmare; and this impersonal pushing is being consciously accelerated by representatives of commercial and political organizations who have developed a number of new techniques for manipulating, in the interest of some minority, the thoughts and feelings of the masses.”
- Aldous Huxley, Preface to A Brave New World

His bleak outlook is not a simple hypothesis or a paranoid delusion. It is a documented fact, present in the world’s most important studies on mass media. Here are some of them:

Elite Thinkers
Walter Lippmann


Walter Lippmann, an American intellectual, writer and two-time Pulitzer Prize winner brought forth one of the first works concerning the usage of mass media in America. In Public Opinion (1922), Lippmann compared the masses to a “great beast” and a “bewildered herd” that needed to be guided by a governing class. He described the ruling elite as “a specialized class whose interests reach beyond the locality.” This class is composed of experts, specialists and bureaucrats. According to Lippmann, the experts, who often are referred to as “elites,” are to be a machinery of knowledge that circumvents the primary defect of democracy, the impossible ideal of the “omnicompetent citizen.” The trampling and roaring “bewildered herd” has its function: to be “the interested spectators of action,” i.e. not participants. Participation is the duty of “the responsible man”, which is not the regular citizen.

SNIP

The notion of escapism is even more relevant today with advent of online video games, 3D movies and home theaters. The masses, constantly seeking state-of-the-art entertainment, will resort to high-budget products that can only be produced by the biggest media corporations of the world. These products contain carefully calculated messages and symbols which are nothing more and nothing less than entertaining propaganda. The public have been trained to LOVE its propaganda to the extent that it spends its hard-earned money to be exposed to it. Propaganda (used in both political, cultural and commercial sense) is no longer the coercive or authoritative communication form found in dictatorships: it has become the synonym of entertainment and pleasure.

http://vigilantcitizen.com/?p=3571
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Related although even more sinister, this piece from WIRED:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Related and also brilliant:
Adam Curtis's documentaries for the BBC, such as "Century of the Self"; see http://adamcurtisfilms.blogspot.com/2007/09/power-of-nightmares.html

"documenting how, beginning in the 1920's, Freudian theories gave rise to public relations techniques that have been used to uncover irrational, often self-centered or petty motivations of whole populations, so as to either cater to or manipulate them.

These psychoanalytically-derived techniques have been used not only by businesses in designing or selling products but also by politicians (and, I might add, by religious leaders -- see, e.g., Brands of Faith) in marketing themselves.

Some using these techniques believed they were helping to bring about a more democratic system in which the consumer or voter was "king." But the point of a "focus group" is not to hear our considered opinions on any given topic but rather to discern the more primitive desires and fears we might not admit to if asked but that often, with or without our awareness, drive our behavior.

After decades of immersion in the P.R. resulting from these techniques, we've gone from seeing ourselves as exploited by business interests to -- rightly or benightedly -- viewing the marketplace as a main source of identity support and fulfillment.
And our democracy has to some extent been reduced from an electorate actively undertaking organized action to make the world better for others as well as ourselves to a relatively atomized, passive agglomeration of consumers who secretly feel entitled to prioritize gratification of their every self-centered whim.

We feel we are free, but in reality, we've been enslaved through our unconscious fears and desires. We all kinda knew that, but the documentary provides fascinating details about how it was done, as well as insight into the implications for our future."


(Summary from http://c-cyte.blogspot.com/2008/01/century-of-self-by-adam-curtis.html )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. That website is freaky
I love to read the articles on there, but I can't stay on there for too long because it makes my head swim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. How do we know that your post about mind control...
...isn't just another layer of mind control? Another entertainment trap for those who find satisfaction in believing they've caught on to the way the game is played? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. compete,conform,create,consume
Those are the four themes that all mind control programs foster.
And people wonder why our society seems so schizoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Excellent!!! Thanks for posting!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. Media As Entertainment Vs. Information...
Mass media reached its peak during the "Golden Age of Television" in the 60s and 70s. Most of us were limited to a handful of channels that offered maybe an hour of news per day. Most cities had one or two major newspapers (some who also owned the local radio and TV station) and few other sources or resources for news. It was easy for the public to be manipulated as we saw with the rise of the advertising/consumer culture. News was a "necessary evil"...mandated by FCC rules and considered a "loss leader"...with lower ratings than the prime time shows. Fortunately, left to their own devices, journalists put accuracy and integrity at the forefront to differentiate their "product" from the next network.

With the rise of cable came more channels and concepts to lure eyeballs...news went from being information to entertainment. CNN then Faux and MSNBC were designed to make a profit first and inform second. It had to fill 24 hours a day with "news" that over the years was watered and dumbed down to fit into the mass consumer model...or to titilate or aggrivate...thus get attention and ratings.

Today our "mass communications" truly is mass...and thank goodness. The internet has proven to be a great resource to avoid the filter of the corporate media...an automatic and electronic alternative that keeps pace with the 24/7 news cycle and separates the wheat from the chaff...eliminating the corporate media's choke hold on the means of distribution of information. Sure, there are those who get sucked into the ablty put propaganda one's fed on Faux, but that's a minority...the same folks who believed the earth was flat or if you turned on a light without a bulb in it the electrcity would drip down.

There will always be those who can, and in many cases, want to be manipulated...find that escapism inside the teevee, but we do live in a unqiue time where individuals can reach out locally, nationally, worldwide to share and communicate and get information the corporates don't deem important or to fact check on the crap they do.

Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Nailed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. How many DU'ers can truthfully say they've explore their subconsciousness and examined
Edited on Thu May-13-10 08:37 AM by KittyWampus
contents thoroughly?

For so many, the Physical is all there is. Western society is so entrenched in the Materialist world view only a very few people ever really become authentic.

Myself? I'm working on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flipper999 Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Could you define authentic?
I think the entire world fairly entrenched in a materialist mindset, and has been for some time. The "Eastern" world (China, Korea, India, etc.) has either caught up or almost caught up to our level of industrialization. The whole world demands the latest products and technology. I can't think of any society (outside of a few small tribal cultures here and there) that shun materialism. What would make them more authentic?

Introspection and meditation (and maybe psychadelic drugs) allow us to see what's inside. I've dabbled a bunch in the first, a little of the second (and none of the third). All I've found is that my mind is mainly filled with the stuff that it's been fed. Stuff like the "mind controlling" icons listed in the article. You can't really get away from any of it. Advertisement is everywhere because companies, governments, religions, and military groups need you to accept their "product" to survive. If their memes don't take, they wither and die.

The more you notice these symbols, the more you realize that they only have the meaning that you are willing to attach to them. Several of the examples in the article are downright silly. The word "sex" on a piece of candy? I don't know; I've never gotten horny from eating skittles. More likely, a desperate graphics design major working for Wrigley convinced his boss that this kind of subliminal garbage actually ensnares the teen-to-young-adult crowd. Since all companies everywhere are just spastically trying to out compete each other, they'll try any symbol or gimmick to sell shit.

I just have a hard time accepting that there's a cabal of old farts sitting in a smoky room somewhere saying, "Hide the word 'sex' in candy and body wash to ensnare the beastly masses in an escapist world of, um... sex? Brilliant!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. "a cabal of old farts"
You wrote: I just have a hard time accepting that there's a cabal of old farts sitting in a smoky room somewhere saying, "Hide the word 'sex' in candy and body wash to ensnare the beastly masses in an escapist world of, um... sex? Brilliant!!!" Well but look at how you've characterized this meme you have a hard time believing. Have you watched the documentary, "Century of the Self," mentioned above? If not, I recommend it to you. Whether or not they are a 'cabal of old farts sitting in a smoky room somewhere' what exists are very powerful advertising agencies that have access to very sophisticated research on what motivates consumers to purchase. Repressed sexuality is one of the most potent. Whether it is the word 'sex' hidden in candy or some other association, don't discount either the power of this influence or the enormous amount of research that has been and continues to be done in this direction. It isn't about candy making you horny but about the product satisfying a repressed need by association. By other things you've said you obviously understand how these symbols work and accurately say, The more you notice these symbols, the more you realize they only have the meaning that you are willing to attach to them. This is a very insightful observation and correct but the most important thing is the 'noticing'. If you become conscious of how the symbols work then there is the possibility of not being unconsciously motivated by them. But the whole point of the theory of the repressed unconscious is that it is dynamically repressed and, therefore, unconscious. What is unconscious is not merely outside your awareness, your conscious mind actively represses it. I'll suggest to you that perhaps the characterization you choose not to believe in is an example of a type of repressive mechanism. You've set up a 'straw man' that can easily be dismissed as absurd so you don't have to consider that there are, in you and all of us, repressed sexual desires and people who willfully attempt to manipulate us through them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Can you provide any evidence...
that anything immaterial and immeasurable is real?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Missed this one!
K/R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Most media people survive by meeting expectations and deadlines. They know who butters their bread.
They share the same values as the rest of the enabling middle to upper-middle class serving corporations. Don't expect better morals or politics from the reporters than from the lawyers. They are the same kind of people doing essentially the same job - they're mercenaries, guns for hire. And, they know it.

The mavericks and principled thinkers get cut out of the herd early in their careers. There are very few real muckrakers left, and they find some tiny niche and usually live on vastly reduced salaries. Most of the real muckrakers don't even get paid, and do it for the Hell of it, because the truth is its own reward. There are some here at DU, which makes this a worthwhile place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kick and Rec!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. Another snip from the article in the OP

A single piece of media often does not have a lasting effect on the human psyche. Mass media, however, by its omnipresent nature, creates a living environment we evolve in on a daily basis. It defines the norm and excludes the undesirable. The same way carriage horses wear blinders so they can only see what is right in front of them, the masses can only see where they are supposed to go.

http://vigilantcitizen.com/?p=3571

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC