Who put the "ur" in "Thursday"? Please come CAPTION this clueless Teabagger!!!

This Teabagging node, Matt Hatter, just finished saying to a reporter, "Heck, little lady, this sign don't make me no racist. . . . I'm just trying to speak a language that Obama and his type can understand. . . . How the heck does anyone find racism in that???? . . . Geez!"

"Um. I guess I'll put it here."


:rofl:

when and when not to use an apostrophe and don't get me started on the double negative.

I'll bet this guy is an "English only" nut as well.

"Because one language is already more that I can handle."

:thumbsup:

:rofl:

n/t

Dude, you forgot an apostrophe. *facepalm*

n/t

liberal elitist attempts to regulate language.

:evilgrin:

from another white guy

Venture to guess he
1. Voted for Reagan
2. Voted for Poppy Bush
3. Voted for W.
4. Is more than happy to collect medicare/SS
5. Is happy to see taxes cut, so long as #4 isn't reduced.

...in fact, the sign looks pretty accurate to me, if one can disregard the grammer and punctuation. But I'll bet the guy's still a Dick.

administration. No way to prove that, of course, but if one thinks honestly about it, that would be an accurate conclusion. (And I'm neither into political debate or epistemological doodlings.)

...isn't that what the Republicans are doing? And a lot of Dems too? As an old white guy, I could be offended that language with it's roots in the black community is creeping into eveyday usage, but I'm not.

But I'll bet most Teabaggers are!!!

98% white people who will, in turn, chuckle at what they might call "wit" but which the writer and the reader both know is a racial "goof," to be nice. A "look, I be jivin'!" kind of joke. (In a bar, in a dancehall with mixed races, this might be fine. But at a (vast) majority white event protesting the spending of (largely) Democrats led by an African-American President, it is "charged."

I'm an old white guy, too. And radically against "political correctness," but my interpretation has nothing to do with that. It's an accurate analysis of how this sign is working from the speaker's and reader's point of view . . . and he, pathetically, expects those seeing him through the media to join in his rancid chuckle. It's pretty light-weight, but sickening nonetheless.

nothing at all racist?

duly noted.

you should ask the pukes who keep cutting education funding.