Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Reid's poll resurgance proof that while voters may be angry at Dems..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:05 PM
Original message
Is Reid's poll resurgance proof that while voters may be angry at Dems..
Edited on Thu May-13-10 02:21 PM by Union Yes
they view Republicans as utterly fucking insane.

Are voters coming to their senses and coming back to the Dem party? Seems that way.

To me, Obama polling at around 50% spells trouble for Repubs. Repubs are so married to corporate America that their party seems to be pushing away populist support. GOP fundraising is down, once again in this cycle.

The Teabag movement hasn't helped the GOP's image in any way.

Recently, this election cycle appeared to belong to Repubs. Theirs for the taking. That was then. Today, Repubs are their own worst enemy. Politically, Harry Reid looked left-for-dead a few weeks ago. Today, he has moved ahead or tied in many polls.

Just my own opinions here but does anyone else see a similar trend?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good thing the Dems are only engaged to corporate America
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Dems are CA's mistress!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I was thinking paid whore, but okay. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Your's is more accurate. keyword: paid!
:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Harry Reid is a weak spineless coward
Fortunately for him, his Repuke opponent is a batshit crazy chicken bartering lunatic.

So re-elect Reid? Absolutely. As the Senator from Nevada. But NOT as Majority Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Word. I like Reid as a Senator, but not as ML.
:fistbump:

I hope he wins re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. So who chose Reid as Majority Leader? The rest of the Democratic Senators.
Whether or not he retains that position is up to them and they do not have the same opinion of Reid as many here at DU have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well of course they don't.
Because the entire goal of the DLC is to undermine the Democratic Party from within. So having a weak pathetic coward as a "Majority leader" aids that process. Same thing with Daschle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think you need to look at the dynmics of the Nevada Race.
and the fact that no one is sure yet who will go against him.

When you add to that, ome good news on the economic front for Democrats it shows that the climate might not be so bad in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wouldn't say "angry at Dems." I would say angry in general but you are right on the second part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well said. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. The only reason the voters are angry at Democrats
is because the republicans have succeeded in blocking legislation and slowing it down and with the help of the republican MSM have made the public think the lack of progress in congress is all the Democrats fault. Because remember they have the majority. The public is too damn dumb to realize the antiquated rules in the Senate that lets the republicans block everything in sight.

If we had a working media that did the job they were supposed to, which is report what is really happening in congress the public would know the republicans are exactly what is wrong with Washington. AND they (the public) would fall all over themselves voting the POS out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Wait until the ads start.
The Repukes are going to use "party of NO" as a positive and the Dems will use it as a negative. It's going to be beautiful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sadly, no...
...like all local or state races, a single race is not always indicative of broader trends.

What happened here, is that the seemingly strongest Republican candidate, Sue Lowden, self-destructed in spectacular fashion because of her stupid chickens-for-checkups statements. When it first hit the papers, she could have defused it by walking it back a bit and acknowledging that it really is not a workable policy prescription. But instead she doubled down and kept touting it as a realistic alternative, and people could not help but recognize her stupidity and arrogance.

Now her Republican rivals are closing in for the kill.

To which I can only say:

:nopity: :rofl: :nopity: :rofl: :nopity: :rofl: :nopity: :rofl: :nopity: :rofl:

On the other hand: it is still months away from the election, and one thing this race illustrates is that people's views can change dramatically in a short time. Reid was all but declared out of the running, now he is very much alive. From that perspective, it is still quite possible that Democrats retain the House and Senate. We have to keep working it.

If only we had Howard Dean at the helm, alas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC