Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Um...seriously WTF are they thinking...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
one_voice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 03:52 PM
Original message
Um...seriously WTF are they thinking...
Edited on Thu May-13-10 11:09 PM by proud patriot
(edited for copyright purposes-proud patriot Moderator Democratic Underground)

GOP blocks oil liability bill

Alaska’s senior senator blocked legislation Thursday that would have dramatically increased liability caps on oil companies, in the wake of one of the industry’s biggest disasters.


Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) objected to a voice vote request by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) on the bill, which would have spiked the maximum liability for oil companies after an oil spill from $75 million to $10 billion. The legislation has significant support from Democrats, and the White House has indicated it backs an increase in liability caps.


But Murkowski said the legislation is “not where we need to be right now” and would unfairly advantage large oil companies by pricing the small companies out of the market. Murkowski did signal that she would be open to "look at the liability cap and consider raising it.” Just not at this moment.


Menendez, speaking to reporters after the bill was halted on the Senate floor, said the opposition indicates that Republicans are on the side of the oil companies, not the American people. There had been no formal floor debate or roll call vote requested on the legislation.


“It’s straightforward, it’s common sense,” Menendez said. “Either you want to fully protect the small businesses, individuals and communities devastated by a man-made disaster — this is not a natural disaster; this is a man-made disaster — or you want to protect multibillion-dollar oil companies from being held fully accountable. Apparently there are some in the Senate who prefer to protect the oil companies.”


Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) called the current $75 million liability a “spit in the ocean” for oil disasters and lawmakers.


(snip)
:spank:



http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/37207.html#ixzz0nqRIdqRm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Republicans and Teabaggers are now responsible for excess damages!
They should be made to lick up the oil and live in the sludge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. they were thinking "If I do anything the oil companies don't like, they will kill me
and my career. It's not like I'm a freakin' Democrat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. And to hell with "fiscal responsibility"??!!!!
So let me get this straight...rethugs want the taxpayers to shoulder this epic cleanup and related losses???

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. The "Maximum Liability"
should be however fucking much it costs to clean the shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alstephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I agree. NO CAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. one_voice,
Please be aware that our posting rules require that copyrighted material be limited to 4 paragraphs or less with a link.

Thanks,

cbayer
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one_voice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Okay..
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. I want the API to explain to me what they mean by "US energy security"
Do they mean the 'security' of their profits? Then I want them to tell the country how much of the oil in the gulf is actually sold in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. WHAT "small oil companies"? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Jed Klampett n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. The repugs are trashing this country....been going on for years and
getting worse..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. I kinda agree with the opposition on this one
$10 billion or even more money is fine for the big oil companies like BP or Exxon Mobil.

The problem is that if Transocean was the one who is liable, a $10 billion fee would bankrupt the company. It would make the industry favor bigger players over the small ones even more.

They should base the maximum liability cap based on a companies annual revenue to be more fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I'd go in the exact opposite direction.
Edited on Thu May-13-10 05:24 PM by JoeyT
If I own an electrical company, don't carry insurance, and one of my employees burns your house down, should I be limited to what I can pay without hurting me, or should I have to pay the full amount? Same goes for Transocean: If they didn't want to be liable for damages, they shouldn't have put themselves in a position to have to pay them.

Edited to add: And by the exact opposite direction I mean "I don't think there should be any cap at ALL. Including seizing and selling the personal holdings of the executives."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Lisa Murkowski is a corporate whore.
Edited on Thu May-13-10 05:47 PM by Blue_In_AK
Shannyn Moore tore her up today on her radio show. It's embarrassing to have these people out there representing Alaskans. Lisa represents Big Oil and Big Banking, not the people of Alaska, and I hope to God the Democrats can find a viable candidate to run against her in November. As of right now, the only opposition she has is from the further right, Joe Miller, the guy Todd Palin is endorsing.

See "Lisa Murkowski Fails the Test, Falls Next to Tree" http://www.themudflats.net/2010/05/13/lisa-murkowski-fails-the-test-falls-next-to-tree/



Hey, Alaska. Remember that “reasonable” Republican senator that we supposedly have? I hear all the time from my Independent and Republican friends that “she’s not that bad.” She’s the one with the 70-something percent approval rating. Well, guess what? Ms. “Not that Bad” just sold you down the river. What the heck? She’s untouchable. She can afford it. She doesn’t need you. All she needs is enough people who’ve already pegged her as “reasonable” and don’t want to be confused with new information.

Bought, paid for and wrapped up in a shiny oil-colored package, Murkowski has delivered herself to big oil, just like her father before her, who bequeathed his Senate seat to her in a grand act of nepotism. The apple, as they say, never falls far from the tree.

<snip>




One of the commenters on that post called her "Lease A Murkowski." :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. They are thinking this will get them more votes. And they are right.
Conservatives love corporations and vote for anyone who defends their destructive practices.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. I like the idea that only the giant oil corporations would survive a spill.
Small businesses should be shut down anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC