The Warren Commission, The Truth, and Arlen Specter

http://www.phillymag.com/articles/features_the_warren_commission_the_truth_and_arlen_specter_part_1/page7

Excerpt:

- - -

WHEN THE Warren Report was first issued, it's conclusions were generally accepted not only because the 26 volumes of supporting evidence seemed so imposing and impenetrable, but also because of the stature and reputation of the Commission members and its counsel. In addition, the public seemed to have a desire — perhaps, even, a need — for its finding. It was a satisfying confirmation that all event which was initially frighteningly beyond belief could, after all, be explained logically and convincingly and with what appeared to be verified finality.

The Warren Commission obviously anticipated that need and from the outset the irresistible premise of the investigators — all of whom were lawyers — was based on the prima facie case against Oswald. If the investigation by its staff was not conducted within formal restrictions and guidelines, its direction, nevertheless, seemed inexorably set. As Arlen Specter says, "The President of the United States didn't want Arlen Specter to do the investigation of the assassination of President Kennedy. The President of the United States appointed the Commission to do that job."

Well, the Commission did that job. It is just difficult to believe that what it came up with is the truth.

And it is difficult to believe that Arlen Specter doesn't know it.


- - -

spectre of democracy

lengthy it is with respect to most U.S. publications' reluctance to do in-depth investigative analyses.

The doubts have been lingering a long time. Arlen Specter obviously was not the only person who had access to information, but had awareness of the information he was not given access to.

That's the chilling part for me.