Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Calif. agents use award ruse to reel in fugitives ($200 and amnesty)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 06:35 AM
Original message
Calif. agents use award ruse to reel in fugitives ($200 and amnesty)
Calif. agents use award ruse to reel in fugitives



SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) -- Dozens of California parole violators showed up to claim a very attractive offer: $200 and amnesty. And dozens of parole violators found themselves in handcuffs and, for most, headed back to prison.

In a corrections department variation on the old bait-and-switch, officials set up an elaborate sting aimed at some of the more than 14,000 California ex-convicts who broke off contact with their parole agents, are suspected of committing new crimes or of violating terms of their parole.

They used a website, an e-mail account, and appointed an agent to the fictitious post of "amnesty program director." They sent 2,700 letters to relatives of parolees-at-large advertising the reward and fake amnesty program.

It wasn't the first time law enforcement has relied on a ruse to collar offenders.

...

"Using the Web page and such is a new way to do it. We used to play on the greed, and now we're playing on the promise that they might be released from custody," said Tony Chaus, who runs the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation's Office of Correctional Safety.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CALIFORNIA_PAROLE_STING?SITE=OHCOL&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting.
Edited on Mon May-17-10 07:45 AM by woo me with science
I have mixed feelings about this, depending on what the crime was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good work.
Very high ROI% in terms of taxpayer dollars to violators caught.

Much safer than no-knock raids by SWAT teams and all the other paramilitary BS that seems to be "trendy" lately.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC