Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Open House Features ($100 million dollar) MV-22 Osprey

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 05:14 AM
Original message
Open House Features ($100 million dollar) MV-22 Osprey
Open House Features MV-22 Osprey
May 17, 2010
Air Force Print News|by Cristie Varvaro

JOINT BASE ANDREWS, Md. - The MV-22 Osprey, one of the workhorse aircraft of the U.S. Marine Corps., was featured at the 2010 Joint Service Open House here.

The Osprey is a multi-mission, military, tiltrotor aircraft featuring both a vertical takeoff and landing, and short takeoff and landing capabilities. It funcations as both a conventional helicopter and a turboprop aircraft.

Air Force pilots also fly the Osprey. An Air Force version of the tiltrotor was fielded in 2009.

"This is a great aircraft, faster than any helicopter," said Marine Lance Cpl. Brandon Ackerman, a flightline mechanic who said the Osprey's primary missions are troop transportation, medical evacuation and light supply transport.

Since entering service with the Marines and Air Force, the Osprey has been deployed for combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Both services train jointly on the Osprey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Osprey costs vs.....
... the US has spent a boatload of cash trying to improve the safety of the Osprey. This aircraft takes off and lands like a 'coptor, then tilts its rotors foreward and flies like a plane.

This provides a huge military advantage in being able to fly troops or equipment at high speed over long distances and land where there is no airstrip.

It also has the potential to serve humanitarian causes, as in Haiti where medical and food supplies were desperately needed and the airstrip was in ruins.

So, if I had a choice between spending taxpayer dollars on Osprey development vs one more sub or carrier, I'd choose the Osprey.

I'd still rather see the money used to help the poor in this country have a decent life, but of course that's not what the MIC wants.

Wouldn't it be interesting to examine what the US could do if we decided we didn't need more firepower than the next 11 largest militaries combined (10 of which are our Allies)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC