|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:39 PM Original message |
Woman sues phone company for exposing her affair. Would you vote to give her money? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. lol n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. lol n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. Does one usually get rewarded for being stupid AND unfaithful??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. What has your question got to do with her business contract? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. The issue is not the affair; the issue is the company's refusing to regard her as an autonomous cus- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
38. even *if* the company was in the wrong - she shouldn't get a penny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 05:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
42. ... Rogers has denied all the allegations, saying it was notified by Nagy and her husband that they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one-eyed fat man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. Not a penny! NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
6. Sorry honey. If you're going to cheat, you really need to cover all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
7. No, if she used her home address she is the one who screwed up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. How did she screw up? The account was in HER name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. with her and her husbands common address |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:13 PM Response to Reply #13 |
25. But her account was hers, not "household services". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
39. Roommates have common addresses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. She screwed up because she made it easy for the company to screw up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. The "screw up" wasn't hers. She has a reasonable expectation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:27 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. The screw up was all hers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
9. The affair is beside the point. They sent her mail to someone else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
10. Are women not allowed their own private business transactions? Suppose it was just some jewelry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. It was a invoice for all household services |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. How is a cell phone a "household service" and when did she give them permission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. She didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catbyte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. The problem is having the bill sent to their house. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
30. Do they have joint credit? If so it's his jewelry, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
12. This dingbat used her home address, what did she expect?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Commonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
15. Not in a million years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
17. Yes. She had a right to the privacy of her billing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
29. How do you know that her actions were despicable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbdo2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
18. If they were following standard billing procedure - which it appears they were - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
19. I'd award her a buck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr. Strange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. I'd agree with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
21. Yes, her personal phone is her personal phone and they had no right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
22. Not a dime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
23. women fought for autonomous finances for decades |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
24. Absolutely. Then I'd give it to the husband in the divorce. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underseasurveyor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
28. No way not a penny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lagomorph (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
31. Oh HELL No! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
33. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
35. A couple of important points here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
36. she might be immoral and stupid and not worthy of sympathy yet still be legally in the right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
40. I predict this case will be decided narrowly on the basis of details in the cellphone contract and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
41. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
43. Not spending my sympathy here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fla_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-10 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
44. I'd giver her my phone number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC