Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wikipedia bias in favor of Rand Paul....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:20 AM
Original message
Wikipedia bias in favor of Rand Paul....
"Paul opposes any kind of institutional racism and would have marched with to abolish legalized racism in the south. Paul favors 9 out of 10 titles (parts) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and only has some constitutional reservations with respect to title 2 of the act which deals with civil rights laws impinging on freedom of choice for private businesses. He is against the Americans with Disabilities Act, believing that both infringe on personal liberty. <57>"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul#Political_views

:puke:

It's like every one of his talking points crammed into two sentences.

Can someone who is familiar with Wikipedia challenge this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
argonaut Donating Member (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Paultards infest the internet like a plague. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. that they do,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Libertarian-tards..
.... in general infest the net. The most delusional dipshits on the face of the earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's what he said on Maddow last night - it's just that the part he has...
...reservations about would lead to segregated private businesses if he had his way, which isn't made clear here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. they put his "I would have marched with Martin Luther King" up there like it's some sort of
accomplishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. He says it over and over to deflect the reality behind his "reservations." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Why would he have marched with King to pass Civil Rights laws he disagrees with? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. He says that he doesn't believe in "institutionalized racism" but he doesn't...
...want the feds to tell business owners what they can do with private property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morgan2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. its not racist to claim you support someone else's right to be racist
Yes the practical ramifications of forcing private businesses to not discriminate on the basis of race did a lot of good, but philosophically disagreeing that the government has a right to do so does not make one evil. Now I completely disagree with Rand Paul's view of the role of government, but his view on the role of government isn't racist. It allows people the freedom to be racist in business practices; the same as the constitution allows people to be racist in speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. the lunch counters wouldn't have desegregated themselves no matter what he says
the free market / invisible hand bullshit is a myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morgan2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. no ones saying they would
but the idea of telling someone what they can or can't do with their property is comparable, not equal, to telling someone what they can or can't say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC