Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"New example" of Blumenthal quote "unearthed" by Politico is anything but

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 08:12 AM
Original message
"New example" of Blumenthal quote "unearthed" by Politico is anything but
http://mediamatters.org/blog/201005210002

Politico is reporting tonight that the Danbury News-Times has "unearthed two new examples of Democratic Attorney General Richard Blumenthal suggesting that he served in Vietnam." One of those examples, however, seems to have appeared in the original New York Times article on Blumenthal's service.

(snip)

It is the Post's quote that the News-Times and Politico are both citing today as "new." But it seems clear -- unless there were two events at the same building during the same year in which Blumenthal offered nearly identical comments -- that the Post's quote and the New York Times' quote are from the same speech. Indeed, searches of the Nexis and Factiva databases uncover no contemporaneous reports besides the Post's of a Blumenthal speech in 2008 at Shelton's Veterans War Memorial Building.

Also -- and here we see the problem with relying on print reports to draw conclusions about a speaker's specific word choices -- it appears that one of the accounts misquotes Blumenthal, as the Times' and Post's quotes are slightly different.

Adding to the confusion is that the News-Times has incorrectly placed that speech as occurring in May 2009, rather than in May 2008, an error that Politico copied.

(end snip)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the info.
I am still waiting to see in CT how this all plays out. So far, the Dems here in CT are sticking by Blumenthal's side. This only adds to all the speculation and confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Could it be this is a state race., Blumenthal is well known there and
the people of CT. are saying --We know our candidate and
do not need National Media interfering.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, clearly.
Blumenthal has been AG here since the early 90's. And does not have the rep they are trying to put on him. He was always squeaky clean actually, to the point that it was a joke here. Clearly he made two mistakes in misspeaking. But there has not been any other instances found and he has stated the truth about his service many more times then these 2 instances. Honestly, it was Linda McMahon looking through all of his past statements to find something. I don't think he actively set out to lie about himself, why tell the truth the other times? I want the national media to stay out. If there is someone better, well, the Dem party here in CT has to decide that. I think they are sticking with Blumenthal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Liberal media bending over backwards to support Democrats.
Wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC