Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stabilize the U.S. Debt: An Online Exercise in Hard Choices

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 10:32 AM
Original message
Stabilize the U.S. Debt: An Online Exercise in Hard Choices
YOUR CHALLENGE:Stabilize the U.S. Debt at 60% of GDP by 2018.

"Committee for a Responsible Federal Government"
To begin the simulation, click the “Next” button above. There are 8 categories where your choices will affect the debt. Negative numbers next to a choice indicate how much the debt will be reduced, positive numbers add to the debt. Use the “Next” and “Back” buttons to navigate to each section; do not use your browser’s navigation arrows. Click the “Done” button when finished making all the choices you want. The bar graph on the right will chart how your choices affect the debt-to-GDP ratio relative to the 60% goal.

For more information on any choice simply click the icon to the left of that choice.
MORE INFORMATION:Read our FAQ's
Learn more about our Federal Budget
See our methodology for this simulator

You make decisions in 3 broad policy areas first:
1-Iraq and Afghanistan
2-2001/2003 tax cuts
3-Discretionary spending growth

Then you work with spending amounts in these 8 categories:
Budget Path
Defense
Domestic
Social Security
Healthcare
Other Spending
Revenues
Tax Expenditures

Each area has several detailed choices. It's not just one big overall cut and dried option to cut or expand an area.

http://crfb.org/stabilizethedebt/#

I made it by 2020.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Quite fun
Got it by 2018. About the only "nasty" thinhs needed for all but high earners were increasing SSI and Medicare ages, which makes sense based on longevity gain since their inception. Military cuts, closing tax loopholes and high earner sutaxes did the rst. I even managed to sneak in some additional help for college and a few other things.

To be honest the goal is not rigorous enough for reality, nor are there more creative choices on expanding progressive taxes and corporate tax rates etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. True.
However, it's better than a lot of budget simulations I've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC