Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator: No Kagan hearings without Clinton files

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:08 PM
Original message
Senator: No Kagan hearings without Clinton files

Elena Kagan, Nominee, Associate Justice, US Supreme Court
50 Years Old
J.D. Harvard Law School
Jewish


WASHINGTON — The top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee warned Monday that he would seek to slow Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan's path to confirmation unless senators get full access to her files as a Clinton administration aide.

"We're heading to what could be a train wreck," Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama said. "I don't believe that this committee can go forward with an adequate hearing" without all records from Kagan's tenure as a White House counsel and then domestic policy adviser to President Bill Clinton.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the Judiciary Committee chairman, last week set hearings to begin on June 28. Sessions said Republicans would ask for a delay unless senators get access to the tens of thousands of pages of Clinton-era records by then.

Sessions doesn't have a veto over the hearing schedule, but his threat set the stage for a potential partisan showdown over the documents and the pace of Kagan's confirmation process.

Kagan, 50, is President Barack Obama's choice to succeed retiring Justice John Paul Stevens. Obama named her two weeks ago and asked that the Senate confirm her in time for her to join the court at the start of its new session this fall. Leahy's hearing date would meet that timetable, paving the way for a vote in the full Senate before its monthlong August vacation.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iyq5lWj9fKKZZ2MJnAJQcZ-8n5xAD9FTDT500

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think I agree with Sessions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sessions is spooky.
When I watch him in action, he's mean and he likes it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's see them. It's called transparency. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tens of thousands of pages what do you think that is going to do
slow this down so much she will never get confirmation. I suppose Obama should go to the republicans and tell them OK guys you are the ones in charge pick your choice so we can confirm them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobwithout Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree
It seems she said some scary things about abortion rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. So
the tens of thousands (more?) of files that the Republicans subpoenaed when they controlled Congress weren't enough for them? They still want more????

:eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC