|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 06:33 PM Original message |
I Give President Obama A Lot of Credit for This Move Today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. As long as there is a timetable on the Pentagon's "study" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still Sensible (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
2. I agree... but I also agree with Joe Sestek |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 06:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I think they'll have it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. Deleted message |
Karenina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 06:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. And even then not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 06:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Nonsense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
7. He just needs to issue an executive order. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 07:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. Segregation was not statutory; DADT is. It requires Congressional repeal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
8. I will anxiously await his answer to this letter: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. I will be a 100% with you once he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teka (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
10. No opposition to Obama is allowed here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KonaKane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 07:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Lately that's all I've been seeing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 07:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. David's been very patient as have we all. I will give him his optimism here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
13. What am I missing my friend? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 07:34 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. It's a way to throw some crumbs at the homos while not really offending the establishment too much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
15. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
16. That article's tone is very unkind to the White House. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
17. He deserves credit for the hearings. He deserves no credit for this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-24-10 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
18. K and R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC