|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
flying rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 05:24 AM Original message |
I think the US isn't taking over the gusher response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 05:28 AM Response to Original message |
1. Does anyone here think the Gov't could be in charge of the clean up of beaches and the ocean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 05:46 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yes. They should be in charge of how it's done and who does it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 07:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Yes they should be in charge. BP needs to be paying for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 07:45 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Yes, just like they did during the Exxon Valdez spill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Today (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 06:23 AM Response to Original message |
3. Once Obama said BP et al had to pay to clean up the mess, he can't really have the gov't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 06:24 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Please point me to the exact wording in the law that states because BP has to pay that they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Today (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 06:27 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. It was a presidential demand, not a law. Unless there is something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 06:36 AM Response to Original message |
6. Taking over abrogates BP of all liability, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 07:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. It does not, and you know it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
droidamus2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 06:36 AM Response to Original message |
7. The point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 06:50 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I've said it before, I'll say it again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 06:56 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Let's press our thumbs that the top kill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-10 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
12. It's not about technology, expertise or even a plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 12th 2024, 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC