Joe Scar is saying that the Sestak situation is unprecedented. What about Chief Justice Earl Warren?

BzaDem

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-25-10 07:42 AM
Original message

Joe Scar is saying that the Sestak situation is unprecedented. What about Chief Justice Earl Warren?

Edited on Tue May-25-10 07:43 AM by BzaDem

Didn't Eisenhower promise (and give) Earl Warren the Chief Justice seat in return for Earl Warren dropping out of the Republican Presidential race in 1952 and throwing his support to Eisenhower?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ShortnFiery

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-25-10 07:42 AM
Response to Original message

1. Joe who?

:silly:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

BzaDem

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-25-10 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #1

2. Updated.

(Joe Scarborough on Morning Joe)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ChairmanAgnostic

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-25-10 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #2

5. I repeat, Joe who?

This story is not about Sestak, but Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ShortnFiery

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-25-10 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #5

7. LOL My question above was also considered "rhetorical."

:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ChairmanAgnostic

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-25-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #7

10. same here.

Looks like Joe's coattails are MIA. Nothing about it being repeated or enlarged.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Pirate Smile

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-25-10 08:04 AM
Response to Original message

3. Scar is an idiot and they desperately are trying to make a scandal. Pathetic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

madinmaryland

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-25-10 08:05 AM
Response to Original message

4. What situation are you talking about??

Thanks!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DainBramaged

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-25-10 08:06 AM
Response to Original message

6. Are you folks trying to get us to watch his shitty show?

I just don't get how anyone here thinks he is relevant

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Kalyke

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-25-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message

8. In the future, it would be helpful if you'd provide some context.

Not everyone watches "Morning 'Ho," and most of us are probably at work where we couldn't watch it, anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rurallib

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-25-10 08:45 AM
Response to Original message

9. Joe has a long record of truth. I trust him.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Skidmore

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-25-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message

11. People should not ignore this. Rs have made scandals out of whole cloth

before which have had long lasting effects while turning a blind eye to the rot at their core.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Sun May 12th 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.