Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chu's undersecretary of energy was BP chief scientist who gave $500 million grant to Chu's lab (NYT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
charlesg Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:42 PM
Original message
Chu's undersecretary of energy was BP chief scientist who gave $500 million grant to Chu's lab (NYT)
Edited on Tue May-25-10 09:48 PM by charlesg
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/26/us/politics/26energy.html

May 25, 2010
BP’s Ties to Agency Are Long and Complex
By HELENE COOPER and JOHN M. BRODER

WASHINGTON — Three years ago, the national laboratory then headed by Steven Chu received the bulk of a $500 million grant from the British oil giant BP to develop alternative energy sources through a new Energy Biosciences Institute. Dr. Chu received the grant from BP’s chief scientist at the time, Steven E. Koonin, a fellow theoretical physicist whom Dr. Chu jocularly described as “my twin brother.” Dr. Koonin had selected the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory at the University of California, Berkeley, over other universities in the United States and Britain in part because of Dr. Chu’s pioneering work in alternative fuels.

Today, Dr. Chu is President Obama’s energy secretary, and he spent Tuesday in Houston working with BP officials to try to find a way to stop the unabated flow of oil from a ruptured well a mile beneath the Gulf of Mexico. Dr. Koonin, who followed Dr. Chu to the Energy Department and now serves as under secretary of energy for science, is recused from all matters relating to the disaster because of his past ties to BP, said Stephanie Mueller, an Energy Department spokeswoman. Dr. Chu, she said, “has never had a financial interest in BP.” Ms. Mueller added, “No one in their right mind would suggest that Dr. Chu is beholden to oil companies, especially since he’s spent the past decade working to cut America’s dependence on oil and move us toward a clean-energy economy.”

The relationships among Dr. Chu, Dr. Koonin and BP illustrate the complexity of the ties between the company and the government now playing out along the Gulf Coast as they struggle to cope with one of the nation’s worst environmental disasters. Just as the Pentagon and military contractors develop symbiotic business, technical and political interdependencies, the government in this case needs BP’s offshore drilling technology and well-control equipment; the company needs the government’s logistical and scientific expertise, including that of Dr. Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning scientist.

Some critics say the Obama administration has relied too heavily on BP’s assessment of the blowout and its solutions for addressing it. But government officials say that BP is legally responsible for plugging the well and cleaning up the oil. And they acknowledge that government lacks the know-how to deal with the problem on its own. While there is no evidence that Dr. Chu or Dr. Koonin have represented BP’s viewpoints in internal deliberations or sought to influence administration policy in a way that would benefit BP, the mere fact of their shared history brought expressions of concern from environmentalists and other critics of the White House’s response to the spill...

-------------------------------------------------

Koonin's biography:
http://www.its.caltech.edu/~koonin/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow.

The talking point yesterday was all about the brilliant Dr. Chu...wonder if they'll continue to stress that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. corrupt oil-nerd?
wth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Corporate incest.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. dupe
Edited on Tue May-25-10 10:00 PM by ShortnFiery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Odd. The NYT didn't care that Cheney was the CEO of Halliburton
Edited on Tue May-25-10 09:58 PM by FrenchieCat
before becoming Vice President.....
Or that Bush was in the Oil Business,
before they tore down a lot of the regulations,
after that secret energy meeting.

Guess this is way more serious! :shrug:


I wonder how much in grants the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory got from the public sector during Bush's terms for research on alternative energy?

I guess this means if you've ever worked at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory at the University of California, Berkeley, don't ever, ever work for the government!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Don't forget the secret closed door meeting Cheney had with the
energy sector before even more de-regulation occurred....just sayin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yep.
Was that before or after the concerned NYT cheerleaded us into war? I can't remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I believe it was before
I will have to look it up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Funny how the NYT is once again the bastion of "Investigative" Journalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The NY Times Broke The Warrantless Wiretapping Story
After Bush personally called them to the WH to demand that they not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. The Cheerleaders Were Fired
The Executive Editor Howell Raines and Judy Miller.

Those were dark days at the Times, they've acknowledged their faults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Shit. And here I thought Chu might have been a rare ACTUALLY QUALIFIED nominee in this cabinet.
Guess not. Just another shill, owned by the industry he should be regulating. (Just like Geitner, Summers, VilSuck, Salazar, etc.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Lovely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. check Ken Salazar`s voting record...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC