|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 01:44 PM Original message |
I Know Why The WH Waited On The Sestak Question..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
1. the media will still frame it as a scandal.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lamp_shade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. Hah!!! Yes. It sure looks that way to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
randr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. Allows Faux Snooze enough time to dig themselves a very big hole! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 02:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. If that's what they were doing, it was very foolish. Stories like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. I don't think it's wise chess to let a lot of people believe for an overly long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. The RepubliBaggers blew another massive sterile wad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
6. What I love is that Sestak says that the president in question was Clinton, not Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
8. I'm also going to speculate that this might have been Rahm's "baby" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
9. Then why wasn't Reagan impeached? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
10. Barack Obama PWN3D the Right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
11. Another media rope-a-dope by the Prez. I think he really enjoys this stuff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
12. The GOP trick is to get Obama to deny it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC