|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
UndertheOcean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:04 PM Original message |
Poll question: In the next 50 years , what are the chances that the 14th Amendment will be repealed ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. I just want to point out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. I can't predict but it IS a bit frightening and here's why: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. Is that fuckwad Rand Paul trying to remove the 14th ammendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonhomme Richard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
4. It will be just like abortion. They would have no interest in getting rid of it.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-29-10 09:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. Another endless source of revenue for the RW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
5. What were the chances that America would start two needless wars and give up the 4th Amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. It doesn't have to be repealed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. It'd take better drugs than SCOTUS can afford for them to make illegal aliens unbound by US law. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Do you really expect the odds of "the law does not apply to these guys" in a ruling to not be 0? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. I think an amendment to the Constitution needs another amendment to the Constitution to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Normally, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 05:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Bit of a stretch to me. IT seems that the threat of Indian uprisings were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-29-10 09:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Yes, it might be a fight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 05:07 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. That would be dangerous, because if arrested for a crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 06:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. It's already been "re-interpreted" enough already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
8. As a wedge issue, it's not very sexy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Oh, I think it is. Fear of the "other" is atavistic and always wins popularly over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
15. Well, more likely entire Constitution will be overturned... Ollie North was working on that -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-29-10 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
20. If the federal government loses influence to the states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 06:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC