Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So I wonder. Did BP stick 400-500 clean-up worker extras on Grand Isle without Hazmat training?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 10:41 PM
Original message
So I wonder. Did BP stick 400-500 clean-up worker extras on Grand Isle without Hazmat training?
Edited on Sun May-30-10 11:41 PM by chill_wind
So I was trying to find an update to the bused in oil-spilled beach cleanup workers story that came about Friday on the tail of Pres Obama's visit to Grand Isle. I searched some of the local news topix-net forums at a Grand Isle local news site without luck. All I managed to find the next day was a rather badly mangled Fox8 local news account. 40- 50 or in the hundreds? From their reporting it's impossible to know. They report. You decide.

http://www.fox8live.com/news/local/story/Grand-Isle-residents-upset-with-the-cleanup-effort/PgHBPSnvsU2Sw6ZEv69l8w.cspx

Just once, though, their reporting (the day before ) was pretty consistent with other outlets'. (more links to some of those below).



For the last week, as thick fudge-looking globs of oil began washing ashore on Grand Isle, Roberts said the parish was lucky if 10 workers were on the island.

"It's not associated with the President arriving," said Doug Suttles, BP Exploration Chief Operating Officer. Also, the BP oil spill contractor who said he hired the workers said it was all coincidence. "Absolutely a coincidence," said Donald Nalty with ES & H, Environmental Safety and Health.

Nalty said, "that request was done on the 23rd (May) at 1800 after their operations meeting. So we've been planning for this over a week now."

Nalty isn't sure why the workers left when the President did, but did explain workers are only allowed to work so many hours a day in hazardous suits.

In Lafitte, where patience and jobs are running out, longtime trawling net-maker Carol Schieffler questions what really happened. "Sooner or later it's gonna come and bite em. I really believe this is gonna bite bp before this over with," said Schieffler.

Suttles said, "the cleanup is not complete yet so they'll be back tomorrow." "Actually tomorrow there will be right at 750 people on Grand Isle," said Nalty, who explained there's a need for even more workers.

Councilman Roberts and the people on Grand Isle will be watching.


http://www.fox8live.com/news/local/story/JP-councilman-questions-Grand-Isle-cleanup/WPIiExLxcEWV21ClpEtt8A.cspx

Hazardous suits?




David Grunfeld / The Times-PicayuneOil cleanup workers line Louisiana 1 in Grand Isle on Friday as the motorcade of President Barack Obama passes.

Does it depend on the day, Mr Nalty?

(see pics)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8444996&mesg_id=8446650

Workers hired by BP rake up globs of oil, which have come ashore on the beaches in southern Louisiana, near Port Fourchon and Grand Isle. It coats the beaches, and each wave brings a new batch.
(Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times / May 22, 2010)


A couple other links to the background story:



BP buses cleanup crews to Grand Isle for Obama's visit, councilman says
By Richard Rainey, The Times-Picayune

May 28, 2010, 4:19PM

BP, the oil company taking flak for its inconsistent response to the massive oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico, bused in 400 extra cleanup workers to Grand Isle during President Obama's visit today, Jefferson Parish Council Chairman John Young said.

"It appears to have been a PR stunt by BP, not to say we don't appreciate the extra participation," Young said. "We certainly need them, but we don't need them for just one day that happens to coincide with a visit from the president."

http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/05/bp_ships_in_clean-up_crews_to.html







Roberts says the overnight contingent of workers was there mainly to furnish a Potemkin-style backdrop for the event — while also making it appear that BP was firmly in command of spill cleanup efforts.

New Orleans NBC affiliate WDSU reports that the workers were paid $12 an hour and came mostly from neighboring Terrebonne and Lafourche parishes.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts2320






But Councilman Roberts says emergency response personnel talked to some workers, who said they were hired Thursday, then told to report for cleanup Friday morning.

Nalty denied that.

"They've at least gotta go through a 24 or 40 hour training in order to be out there on the beach. I don't buy it,” he said.

Either way, Roberts is suspicious of the timing.

"When you have people here that are struggling, and then you put on a show because you know the President of the United States is in town, it's just totally unacceptable,” he said.“It's shameful. It in no way compares to the efforts they've had the last few weeks, and I'd like to know who made the decision to do this and why.

http://www.wwltv.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/JP-Officials-Presence-of-hundreds-of-cleanup-workers-likely-a-staged-event-95149564.html






I'd like to know more from Nalty, too. He denies the locals' story, he denies the few workers' stories, and "He doesn't buy it." ? He seems to be the point man in the various media interviews-- he's the one cited in more than one account as the subcontractor responsible for hiring of cleanup crews to go to Grand Isle. He's the one telling the media exactly how many will be back the NEXT day. Yet HE doesn't/won't say where they were hired and brought in from, and all the accounts cite that the workers were guarded with both the media and the local officials, both. The most reported in any of the accounts is that a few DID tell locals they were hired the day before. One said they were hired just for the day.

I was really curious about that-- where they were hired from. Why is that all supposed to be a state secret of some kind?

As I'd posted on Friday, this would seem like a good bet, for starters:



Googling what some locals were reporting about radio recruitment ads the day before...


Clean Up Positions

Terrebonne Parish Administration Thursday, May 27, 2010

Ashland Services, LLC needs 500 workers to assist with the oil spill cleanup in Grand Isle. Recruitment is taking place today, Thursday, May 27, 2010 only at 7528 Main Street (old unemployment office).

Workers will be paid $12.00 per hour and are expected to work 14 hour days 7 days a week. Transportation to Grand Isle, breakfast and lunch will be provided daily. All required safety gear will be provided by Ashland Services, LLC.

http://www.tpcg.org/view.php?f=main&p=news&i=192

Ashland Services, LLC
http://ashlandservicesllc.com/services.html


Nalty had said in one of the media accounts that there had been around 300 workers at Grand Isle on previous days.
But Chris Roberts, Councilman, Jefferson Parrish (video clip) tells CNN up until today about 20 workers were typical.
The bused in workers said they were not allowed to say where they were from? Dumb.

clip:
http://www.mediaite.com/online/sham-workers-bp-bussed-in-clean-up-crew-for-president-obamas-gulf-visit

What's ultimately important is that they will now keep coming back. Right?



From main thread:

BP Buses In 400 Workers During Obama's Visit
Jefferson Parish Councilman Calls Company's Actions 'Shameful'

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4402592&mesg_id=4402592



Here's a question. Did those bused in workers have the protection and benefit of the 24- 40 hours of Hazmat training?

It's not in the recruitment ad. Did BP stick 400-500 people on the beach cleanup at the 11th hour without it? The brief CNN video clip does show them working on the beach. If they had it, does it include any training of disposal of their hazmat coverings at the end of the day? In the first link, locals said they were finding them in the town dumpsters and had to call BP to come and remove them. (they did.)

So do ALL the workers get hazmat suits or not? Do they all get the vital training? Or not?

Something's fishy with Mr. CEO and Mr. Nalty. There are inconsistencies after inconsistency. Why won't BP/Nalty or anyone own up to the contradictions by locals and why should it be a secret who hired them and provided the buses?

Is Nalty telling us the truth? If he is, he's not very good at it. A President is coming. Did BP/Nalty really think no one would notice the same-day invasion of 400 workers out of "nowhere"?

And at what price, if any, to those workers' health were they put out there for the cleanup/visit/cameras?

All Nalty has to do is tell us the date and place they were hired from.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

(edited for wrecked formatting )




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. The worst thing is that they are FORBIDDEN to wear masks/respirators.

This is nothing short of CRIMINAL on BP's part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Link? And what's BP's logic behind that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. To protect themselves from liability. If BP lets them wear
protection,they are admitting that they know the sites are dangerous, thus opening themselves to lawsuits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. But... How the fuck can that even work?
There are mountains of evidence that this stuff is harmful if inhaled. Not just in America, in incidents globally, it's all fucking there. And BP can't possibly claim ignorance. You can't be a major oil company and then go "Dyerhur, we's gots no ideer how tha thar oil stuff dun work!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. it's been all over DU, dozens of links/sources.

The perverted "logic" is attempting to minimize the PR damage and hide/mask the extent of damage; the same reason why they are using toxic dispersants in unprecedented amounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. p.s.: here's one link (among many that could be found):
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Thanks
I wasn't denying that that was what was going on. I just wanted to read it myself.

The same thing went down with the Exxon Valdez. And I know - personally know - people who are dying from exposure to thisstuff, all these years later. Cancers are the lest of the problems, these chemicals are also a source of "mystery diseases", autoimmune problems, you name something unpleasant and you can find it in the body of someonefro mcordova or Valdez who worked on the spill.

Twenty years later and it looks as if people have already forgotten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. You're very welcome. Thanks for your input! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. OSHA should be on site
they should be insisting there be proper training and protective gear.
BP cannot be trusted - just today Hayward said the workers are sickened with FOOD POISONING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. +1 . We should have mobilized a massive temporary federal jobs core program
Edited on Mon May-31-10 02:44 PM by chill_wind
for this crisis, as others have suggested, unified and organized under responsible federal oversight, training and safety authorities.

I was looking at the jobs boards-- it appeared on those that much or all of it is being locally piece-mealed out by one private temp hiring service after another.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Most workers are only receiving 4 hours of training
Don't know the details on those specific workers, but Nalty's clearly lying about the 24 - 40 hour training being required.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8444883
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yes, and I'm very skeptical these workers had even that.
Mr Nalty's story has a lot of problems like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Agree on that
He's tap dancing all over the place.

I just started thinking about another aspect of this.

BP has clearly outsourced much of the hiring and training of clean-up workers to companies like Nalty's and Command Center and who knows how many others. It's becoming clearer by the day that they are not being trained, and are not being provided with decent wages and proper safety equipment. If this follows the pattern of the Exxon Valdez, many of these workers are likely to become ill. There are violations at each stage of that, but since BP outsourced it, I'll bet they will lay that blame on the companies they outsourced to and will try to weasel out of any responsibility from that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. And telling workers not to not even disclose even who is hiring them
Edited on Mon May-31-10 12:38 PM by chill_wind
in some cases, as reported, is meant to help limit their exposure (the smaller companies') for as long as possible, too, maybe?

Man, there is so much that seems so systemically (systematically?) messed up.

PS. Thank you so much for all the stuff you pulled together in your linked thread

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yep, all about limiting their exposure (covering their asses)
against later claims.

And again, doing the minimum for safety, etc which is what brought about this whole mess in the 1st place.

The minimum the government will allow needs to be set much, much higher in all theses areas.

And thank you for your thread.

This is what I love about DU, caring people pulling together info to make sense of it all and investigate and examine the whole picture.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBI_Un_Sub Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Absolutely unconscionable
The dispersant is toxic.
Crude oil contains toxic fractions.
You can'tjust pick homeless out of the Vieux Carré or City Park.
And you can't "retrain" jobless shrimpers in an hour.

One of the "folk legends" that I have picked up about crude oil fumes is that they are carcinogenic to sweat gland areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Warning-- there's a dead bird in one my links to LATimes images of other workers.
Edited on Sun May-30-10 11:49 PM by chill_wind
My orginal post had a single pic itself (no bird) but I edited for formatting and now the edit window is past, as I remember the other pics at the link. My apologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. A somewhat curious thing --about the Ashland Services LLC website
Edited on Mon May-31-10 12:23 PM by chill_wind
which I theorize was the hiring source for the workers from the local gov't recruitment ad..

Their current website was still under construction just two weeks ago. It's very generic looking and sparse in content and the footer doesn't tell you when it was launched or designed by who, but here's a cached version of it being under construction as of May 14:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:6NZQzPnXV_QJ:www.ashlandservicesllc.com/+who+owns+ashland+services+llc&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

In their "about", they refer to the ownership, but the ownership isn't identified.

The Ownership of Ashland Services has over fifty years of contract labor experience, Ship building, Fabrication in Steel, Aluminum, and Stainless, Sand Blasting and Painting, Tank Cleaning, and Coating.

They say they've been around since 2005 & Katrina. I don't doubt they are a legit company, but I'd like to know more about their actual ownership. I'm not finding much of anything else on the web about them.

Does anybody know the company, or anybody good with domain tools and whois stuff?







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC