|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
impik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 11:33 AM Original message |
The whole world was excited today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. Because we know the Senate has to ratify it for it to be valid. They didn't ratify previous treaties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
impik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 11:48 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Of course they did. And they will this time too. This is a lame and fact-less excuse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 11:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. No, the US Senate NEVER ratified the SALT II treaty. Sorry, you're WRONG. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 12:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. You are correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 12:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I hope so. But those of us that know history don't want to count our chickens just yet...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 12:05 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. That treaty still set a standard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 12:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. What's disgusting? I'm FOR this treaty and I hope the senate gets its head out of its ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 11:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. but bush made backing out of a treaty (formerly known as the supreme law of the land) so easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindandSoul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
2. I so agree! We barely heard about this very positive historic moment! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 11:50 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. A president signing a treaty does not make it so. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindandSoul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 02:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. Yes, I know! But it certainly vouch well for intention and, with this President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Froward69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
3. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
8. Not even DU too much, and it is shocking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 12:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. It's not a treaty until the senate ratifies it. Fingers crossed they do. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 12:06 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. see response above n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 12:11 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. The senate is full of scare-mongering idiots. I hope they vote for it. But I'll wait to see. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tumbulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
16. our media is for corporate rule only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-10 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
18. The corporatemediawhores in the US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC