... I'd assume the same offer was made with Chile.
Which brings us to the question, is uranium from the Ukraine called "Ukranium"? (heh! Been wanting to do that joke for two days!)
Seriously .... I think this is one reason why the WH isn't making a big deal about where this stuff is going. If you saw Gibbs answer to the question yesterday (about where it was going) he was a bit evasive. I think that's partly because they dont want our enemies to start going "OBAMA IS HOARDING URANIUM!!!!" .... just think about it, if Kim Jung Il was doing this, we'd be going CRAZY. And there's the issued that it doesn't play well to be broadcasting the fact that we're buying uranium from foreign countries "in the middle of a recession." (Despite the fact that we're no longer in the middle of one.)
Of course the President can see the long term benefits of doing so, despite the short term cost.
It WOULD be nice if we could charge THEM though, lol, that would be brilliant. He's good, but he's not THAT good. :)
According to a senior administration official, under the deal announced Monday the United States will pay to secure the highly enriched uranium, which will likely be sent to Russia for conversion into low-enriched uranium for nuclear power plants. As part of the deal, the United States will also help supply Ukraine with new low-enriched fuel and a new research facility.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/world/13summit.html