Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scott Brown - MA - R finance regulatory legislation is "going to be an extra layer of regulation."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 01:37 PM
Original message
Scott Brown - MA - R finance regulatory legislation is "going to be an extra layer of regulation."
Edited on Thu Apr-15-10 01:39 PM by Mass
And this is my senator. Sigh.

Once again way over his head on these issues.


http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_04/023359.php

QUOTE OF THE DAY.... Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) was asked for his opinion yesterday on the financial regulatory reform bill advancing in the Senate. "I can't support it,'' he said.

Explaining why, the Republican said one of his main concerns is that the legislation is "going to be an extra layer of regulation." Which is, of course, true. That's the point of the legislation. The financial industry went unchecked and nearly destroyed the global economy. That's why the legislation is being considered -- to bring oversight and accountability through regulation.

What was especially interesting, though, is hearing the confused senator try to explain how he'd like to see the legislation improve. (thanks to reader R.L.)

Brown left open the possibility that he could support a compromise.

"I want to see when it's going to come up, how it's going to come up,'' he said. "I'm always open to trying to work something through so it is truly bipartisan.''

Brown, whose vote could be critical as Democrats seek to find a GOP member to avoid a filibuster, assiduously avoided talking about specifics.

When asked what areas he thought should be fixed, he replied: "Well, what areas do you think should be fixed? I mean, you know, tell me. And then I'll get a team and go fix it.''

To clarify, when the senator asked "Well, what areas do you think should be fixed?" he was talking to a reporter who wanted to know what kind of changes he hoped to see.

Brown went on to say that he finds the notion of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency problematic because "it's more government." He added, "Is that good? ... If it's an area we need to fix, then I'm certainly open to it. But I haven't heard that that's the biggest thing that's problematic with it.''

Do you ever get the feeling that maybe Scott Brown isn't quite ready for prime-time, and that his service in the Senate is more humiliating than it should be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. this Dude knows he's done in 2012 if he doesn't start acting like a Democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grand Taurean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Then he's done already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. agreed. But it's going to be fun watching him choose between his career and his Party, ain't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He is done in any case, but at least, he could try to make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's pulling those lies out of his pink leather covered ass.
Please, Dems. Find a damn good candidate for 2012.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grand Taurean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. A defintion of "Jackass":
Anyone who said that there is no difference between the following:
Creigh Deeds and Bob McDonnell, Jon Corzine and Chris Christie, Martha Coakley and Scott Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. No shit Scott, that's the FUCKING POINT!
In order to add new regulations to the financial industry you have to actually do more regulating. Is he asking if there's a way to regulate the financial industry without regulating them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wow, the highlighted quotes shows this is way over his head
He really seems not to have a clue about anything in the bill. Even if he is uninformed, you would think his staff would have helped him get a position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. The whole reason we had near economic collapse is because we had NO Government-Fool!
Ugh I hate that guy. Sorry you got layered with that guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Another idiot moron Republican - knows how to get elected and THAT's IT
I'm suck of these fucking useless fakers wasting space and destroying our country in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC